Feed them slop: Alignment, attunement, and the affective lure of slopaganda

From Charlie Kirk reborn as Terminator to bearded ladies dancing at cocktail parties in ‘Trump Gaza’, social media feeds now churn with slopaganda or ‘agitslop’. Unlike deepfakes, which lure viewers into mistaking AI-generated videos for reality, slopaganda is obviously fake but affectively real. As the related term ‘agitslop’ suggests, slopaganda carries an affective lure. If it manages to hook a viewer, it stirs up emotional sediment – insecurities, indignations, and petty grievances. As many have noted, generative AI models trained on vast troves of internet comments and social media posts inevitably reflect and refract deep-seated human biases. But the affective resonance of AI slop goes further, both technically and socially. Drawing on the concept of ambient rhetoric, which describes rhetoric not as persuasion between individual agents but as a process of attunement to conditions, moods, and affordances, this article frames AI slop as a productive resonance between ambient rhetoric and supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning through human feedback. Beyond inheriting biases from training data, fine-tuning and alignment through reinforcement learning through human feedback train models to ‘feel out’ which responses resonate in sociotechnical environments. In this way, AI models are optimised for rhetorical attunement. Slop also responds to the insatiable appetite of the social media ‘feed’. In this sense, AI slop is not merely an error or excess but an ambient rhetoric highly attuned to dominant norms and technical incentives. When AI slop intervenes in politics as slopaganda or agitslop, it reflects how trained, fine-tuned, and aligned AI models fold into and intensify existing ideological, rhetorical, and technical formations rather than disrupting them. Attending to the affective resonance of slopaganda thus offers a way to reckon with AI systems as ideological attunement machines that optimise feeling, relevance, and response within sociotechnical environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cultural Studies
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494261468632
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feed them slop: Alignment, attunement, and the affective lure of slopaganda

Robert Topinka
European Journal of Cultural Studies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Feed them slop: Alignment, attunement, and the affective lure of slopaganda

Robert Topinka
article en

Abstract

From Charlie Kirk reborn as Terminator to bearded ladies dancing at cocktail parties in ‘Trump Gaza’, social media feeds now churn with slopaganda or ‘agitslop’. Unlike deepfakes, which lure viewers into mistaking AI-generated videos for reality, slopaganda is obviously fake but affectively real. As the related term ‘agitslop’ suggests, slopaganda carries an affective lure. If it manages to hook a viewer, it stirs up emotional sediment – insecurities, indignations, and petty grievances. As many have noted, generative AI models trained on vast troves of internet comments and social media posts inevitably reflect and refract deep-seated human biases. But the affective resonance of AI slop goes further, both technically and socially. Drawing on the concept of ambient rhetoric, which describes rhetoric not as persuasion between individual agents but as a process of attunement to conditions, moods, and affordances, this article frames AI slop as a productive resonance between ambient rhetoric and supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning through human feedback. Beyond inheriting biases from training data, fine-tuning and alignment through reinforcement learning through human feedback train models to ‘feel out’ which responses resonate in sociotechnical environments. In this way, AI models are optimised for rhetorical attunement. Slop also responds to the insatiable appetite of the social media ‘feed’. In this sense, AI slop is not merely an error or excess but an ambient rhetoric highly attuned to dominant norms and technical incentives. When AI slop intervenes in politics as slopaganda or agitslop, it reflects how trained, fine-tuned, and aligned AI models fold into and intensify existing ideological, rhetorical, and technical formations rather than disrupting them. Attending to the affective resonance of slopaganda thus offers a way to reckon with AI systems as ideological attunement machines that optimise feeling, relevance, and response within sociotechnical environments.

European Journal of Cultural Studies
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.