‘It’s really a minefield’: exploring the disconnect between understanding of social media policies and academic freedom and behaviour online

Social media has become essential to academic communication, offering a platform to share research and teaching, to counter misinformation, and to contribute expert perspectives. Academics’ public engagement can also attract controversy and create tension between academic freedom and universities’ desire to manage reputational risk. In Australia, universities have long promoted academic freedom, but this principle is tested when scholars’ online expression provokes negative attention. This study uses surveys and online focus groups to examine how academics understand academic freedom, their use of social media, and institutional support. Findings reveal that although many academics are confident in their conceptual understanding of academic freedom, they often feel constrained when expressing themselves online. The article argues that a perceived lack of institutional backing and fear of consequences contributes to self-censorship, limiting scholars’ online engagement and undermining academic freedom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2026.2708299
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘It’s really a minefield’: exploring the disconnect between understanding of social media policies and academic freedom and behaviour online

Sarah Hook, Roger Dawkins, David Arness, Liquan Liu et al.
Higher Education Research & Development
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

‘It’s really a minefield’: exploring the disconnect between understanding of social media policies and academic freedom and behaviour online

Sarah Hook, Roger Dawkins, David Arness, Liquan Liu, Nicole Bridges, Sandra Noakes
article en

Abstract

Social media has become essential to academic communication, offering a platform to share research and teaching, to counter misinformation, and to contribute expert perspectives. Academics’ public engagement can also attract controversy and create tension between academic freedom and universities’ desire to manage reputational risk. In Australia, universities have long promoted academic freedom, but this principle is tested when scholars’ online expression provokes negative attention. This study uses surveys and online focus groups to examine how academics understand academic freedom, their use of social media, and institutional support. Findings reveal that although many academics are confident in their conceptual understanding of academic freedom, they often feel constrained when expressing themselves online. The article argues that a perceived lack of institutional backing and fear of consequences contributes to self-censorship, limiting scholars’ online engagement and undermining academic freedom.

Higher Education Research & Development
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.