Vascular access device utilization and first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter after anesthetic induction in perioperative general anesthesia patients

BACKGROUND: The selection, placement and management of vascular access devices for surgical patients constitute a complex, multidisciplinary process. The first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter after anesthetic induction is a core nursing quality metric. This study investigated vascular access device utilization and the success rate in perioperative patients, providing a scientific basis for management and enhancing the quality and safety of patient care. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted to collect data on surgical patients in the operating room, including vascular access device characteristics (size, number, placement site, and method), the first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter, intraoperative utilization and potential factors influencing the success rate. Vascular access device related complications were identified via electronic medical records review. RESULTS: Among 5374 patients, 75.0% (4031) of short peripheral catheters were ⩾18-gauge and brought from the ward, while 25.0% (1343) were ⩽18-gauge. The size and number of vascular access devices were sufficient to meet clinical needs. One complication was identified: postoperative extravasation. The first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter was 87.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified body mass index (18.5-23.9: OR = 0.102, 95% CI: 0.041-0.253; 24-27.9: OR = 0.080, 95% CI: 0.034-0.189), visible (OR = 179.547, 95% CI: 81.491-395.593), and palpable (OR = 146.922, 95% CI: 78.398-275.339) veins after tourniquet placement, and circulating nurse seniority (⩾10 years: OR = 2.252, 95% CI: 1.173-4.323) as independent factors associated with the success rate. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.897, indicating good discriminative efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Current vascular access devices, predominantly short peripheral catheters, were sufficient to meet intraoperative needs. This is the first report identifying the factors associated with the first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Vascular Access
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298261468645
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vascular access device utilization and first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter after anesthetic induction in perioperative general anesthesia patients

Furong Liu, Meng-Song Wang, Lu-jun Zhi, Yang Wen
The Journal of Vascular Access
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Vascular access device utilization and first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter after anesthetic induction in perioperative general anesthesia patients

Furong Liu, Meng-Song Wang, Lu-jun Zhi, Yang Wen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The selection, placement and management of vascular access devices for surgical patients constitute a complex, multidisciplinary process. The first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter after anesthetic induction is a core nursing quality metric. This study investigated vascular access device utilization and the success rate in perioperative patients, providing a scientific basis for management and enhancing the quality and safety of patient care. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted to collect data on surgical patients in the operating room, including vascular access device characteristics (size, number, placement site, and method), the first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter, intraoperative utilization and potential factors influencing the success rate. Vascular access device related complications were identified via electronic medical records review. RESULTS: Among 5374 patients, 75.0% (4031) of short peripheral catheters were ⩾18-gauge and brought from the ward, while 25.0% (1343) were ⩽18-gauge. The size and number of vascular access devices were sufficient to meet clinical needs. One complication was identified: postoperative extravasation. The first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter was 87.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified body mass index (18.5-23.9: OR = 0.102, 95% CI: 0.041-0.253; 24-27.9: OR = 0.080, 95% CI: 0.034-0.189), visible (OR = 179.547, 95% CI: 81.491-395.593), and palpable (OR = 146.922, 95% CI: 78.398-275.339) veins after tourniquet placement, and circulating nurse seniority (⩾10 years: OR = 2.252, 95% CI: 1.173-4.323) as independent factors associated with the success rate. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.897, indicating good discriminative efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Current vascular access devices, predominantly short peripheral catheters, were sufficient to meet intraoperative needs. This is the first report identifying the factors associated with the first-attempt success rate of large-bore short peripheral catheter.

The Journal of Vascular Access
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.