Medicaid Payment Policies for Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, 2020-2025

Abstract Background The potential of Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) to address the opioid crisis has been limited by restrictive federal and local policies that required frequent clinic visits for medication. Unprecedented federal regulatory changes started in early COVID-19 and were made permanent in 2024, and allow clinics increased flexibility in granting take-home medication to patients. Medicaid payment policies can profoundly shape provider behaviors but may not align with regulatory changes. Methods We conducted a systematic synthesis of Medicaid MMT payment and billing policies among 40 states over 3/2020-7/2025. Results More than half of the states continued to adopt a per-dose or per-diem approach to paying for methadone dosing and a per-service approach to paying for addiction counseling, thus tying Medicaid revenue closely to clinic visits. More than one-quarter maintained a flat bundled payment dating back to pre-pandemic era that provided little incentive for granting patients more than one week of take-home medication. Adoption of a two-tiered bundled payment modeled after Medicare’s payment increased over time but remained limited. Conclusion Medicaid payment policies for MMT saw limited changes over the 5 years following initial federal regulatory changes. Practice changes towards more flexible and patient-centered care may be hindered without compatible changes in payment approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag195
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicaid Payment Policies for Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, 2020-2025

Ju‐Chen Hu, Yuhua Bao, Shashi N. Kapadia, Barbara Andraka‐Christou et al.
Health Affairs Scholar
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Medicaid Payment Policies for Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, 2020-2025

Ju‐Chen Hu, Yuhua Bao, Shashi N. Kapadia, Barbara Andraka‐Christou, Noa Krawczyk, Bruce R. Schackman, Kayla Hutchings, Promi Chakraborty
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The potential of Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) to address the opioid crisis has been limited by restrictive federal and local policies that required frequent clinic visits for medication. Unprecedented federal regulatory changes started in early COVID-19 and were made permanent in 2024, and allow clinics increased flexibility in granting take-home medication to patients. Medicaid payment policies can profoundly shape provider behaviors but may not align with regulatory changes. Methods We conducted a systematic synthesis of Medicaid MMT payment and billing policies among 40 states over 3/2020-7/2025. Results More than half of the states continued to adopt a per-dose or per-diem approach to paying for methadone dosing and a per-service approach to paying for addiction counseling, thus tying Medicaid revenue closely to clinic visits. More than one-quarter maintained a flat bundled payment dating back to pre-pandemic era that provided little incentive for granting patients more than one week of take-home medication. Adoption of a two-tiered bundled payment modeled after Medicare’s payment increased over time but remained limited. Conclusion Medicaid payment policies for MMT saw limited changes over the 5 years following initial federal regulatory changes. Practice changes towards more flexible and patient-centered care may be hindered without compatible changes in payment approaches.

Health Affairs Scholar
University of Central Florida (US), Tulane University (US), Cornell University (US), CUNY School of Law (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.