Determinants of bill co-sponsorship in open-list proportional representation systems: the case of Chile, 2018–2022

Bill co-sponsorship allows legislators to signal policy priorities, build alliances, and cultivate constituencies. Yet, it is unclear whether legislators choose collaborators primarily because they share partisan ties, represent similar territorial interests, belong to the same coalition, or share personal traits such as gender, especially in countries where electoral reforms alter opportunities for legislative collaboration. We examine co-sponsorship in Chile’s Chamber of Deputies during the 2018–2022 term, after a reform that increased district magnitude (DM), reduced the number of districts, fragmented the party system, and introduced gender quotas. Building on the pre-reform study by Alemán and Calvo, we explore if the determinants of legislative collaboration changed under the new rules. Analyzing 1,890 legislator-initiated bills and 13,203 legislator pairs, we use ERGM models to estimate tie formation and C-ERGM models to estimate tie intensity. The results show that party affiliation remains the central organising principle of legislative co-sponsorship after reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legislative Studies
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2026.2709975
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of bill co-sponsorship in open-list proportional representation systems: the case of Chile, 2018–2022

Nicolás Mimica, Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini, Patricio Daniel Navia, Tomás López
Journal of Legislative Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Determinants of bill co-sponsorship in open-list proportional representation systems: the case of Chile, 2018–2022

Nicolás Mimica, Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini, Patricio Daniel Navia, Tomás López
article en

Abstract

Bill co-sponsorship allows legislators to signal policy priorities, build alliances, and cultivate constituencies. Yet, it is unclear whether legislators choose collaborators primarily because they share partisan ties, represent similar territorial interests, belong to the same coalition, or share personal traits such as gender, especially in countries where electoral reforms alter opportunities for legislative collaboration. We examine co-sponsorship in Chile’s Chamber of Deputies during the 2018–2022 term, after a reform that increased district magnitude (DM), reduced the number of districts, fragmented the party system, and introduced gender quotas. Building on the pre-reform study by Alemán and Calvo, we explore if the determinants of legislative collaboration changed under the new rules. Analyzing 1,890 legislator-initiated bills and 13,203 legislator pairs, we use ERGM models to estimate tie formation and C-ERGM models to estimate tie intensity. The results show that party affiliation remains the central organising principle of legislative co-sponsorship after reform.

Journal of Legislative Studies
New York University (US), Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.