Inclusive designs that allow the inclusion of a broader population in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of randomization ratio and analysis strategy

In most multi-arm randomized controlled trials, all participants need to be eligible to be randomized to all the arms. This means some participants are excluded from participating in multi-arm studies. We propose to relax this by considering a 'differential randomization' approach that allows the inclusion of participants who are eligible for some but not all arms, as in some innovative trial approaches. We refer to a multi-arm design that employs differential randomization as an 'inclusive design' because it maximizes participant inclusion. Considering superiority comparisons for a normal endpoint, we evaluate the performance of some analysis methods for a three-arm inclusive design by simulation studies. Methods include pairwise or overall regression analysis, an averaging approach that pools summary statistics using prevalence rate, and a meta-analysis type framework. We compare the statistical power when the inclusive design employs different treatment allocation schemes. We find that using equal allocation ratio within each subpopulation leads to a higher disjunctive power than using equal allocation across arms, when the many-to-one comparisons are analysed using the corresponding pairwise data separately as opposed to using all data in a single regression analysis. We find that differential covariate-outcome relations among patients can affect the property of the inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802261475687
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive designs that allow the inclusion of a broader population in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of randomization ratio and analysis strategy

Kim May Lee, Nigel Stallard, Richard Emsley, Ziyan Wang
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Inclusive designs that allow the inclusion of a broader population in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of randomization ratio and analysis strategy

Kim May Lee, Nigel Stallard, Richard Emsley, Ziyan Wang
article en

Abstract

In most multi-arm randomized controlled trials, all participants need to be eligible to be randomized to all the arms. This means some participants are excluded from participating in multi-arm studies. We propose to relax this by considering a 'differential randomization' approach that allows the inclusion of participants who are eligible for some but not all arms, as in some innovative trial approaches. We refer to a multi-arm design that employs differential randomization as an 'inclusive design' because it maximizes participant inclusion. Considering superiority comparisons for a normal endpoint, we evaluate the performance of some analysis methods for a three-arm inclusive design by simulation studies. Methods include pairwise or overall regression analysis, an averaging approach that pools summary statistics using prevalence rate, and a meta-analysis type framework. We compare the statistical power when the inclusive design employs different treatment allocation schemes. We find that using equal allocation ratio within each subpopulation leads to a higher disjunctive power than using equal allocation across arms, when the many-to-one comparisons are analysed using the corresponding pairwise data separately as opposed to using all data in a single regression analysis. We find that differential covariate-outcome relations among patients can affect the property of the inference.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
King's College London (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.