Pulse waveform characteristics for diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background: Arterial waveforms are altered in left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic implications of automatically analyzed pressure waveforms and their changes over time in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Methods: Arterial waveforms were recorded non-invasively using applanation tonometry in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in matched controls. Waveform parameters were analyzed with respect to the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETi), the characteristics of antegrade and reflected waves, their interaction as quantified by the Augmentation Index (AIx), and wave intensity, expressed as the ratio of the S and D peak intensities (SDR). Results: Overall, 78 HFrEF patients (ejection fraction (EF) 28+/-9%) and 78 controls (EF 66+/-8%), matched for sex, age, presence of hypertension and diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were included. All waveform parameters were statistically different between patients and controls. In ROC analysis, HFrEF patients and controls could be separated best using LVETi (AUC 0.897, p<0.0001) and SDR (AUC 0.911, p<0.0001). In newly diagnosed and treated HFrEF patients, the AUC for discrimination between HFrEF patients from controls was almost ideal (0.978, p<0.0001), when a combination of LVETi and SDR was used. Finally, in 46 HFrEF patients with available follow up data, concordance analysis showed a high agreement of up to 0.8 between changes in the cardiac function (eg., using EF) and changes in several waveform parameters. Conclusions: Pulse waveform parameters may be useful for screening and follow-up of patients with HFrEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00036.2026
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulse waveform characteristics for diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Antonis Argyris, Stefan Orter, Kathrin Danninger, Eugenijus Kaniušas et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Pulse waveform characteristics for diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Antonis Argyris, Stefan Orter, Kathrin Danninger, Eugenijus Kaniušas, Christopher Mayer, Thomas Weber, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Bernhard Hametner, Athanase Protogerou, Ronald K. Binder
article en

Abstract

Background: Arterial waveforms are altered in left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic implications of automatically analyzed pressure waveforms and their changes over time in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Methods: Arterial waveforms were recorded non-invasively using applanation tonometry in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in matched controls. Waveform parameters were analyzed with respect to the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETi), the characteristics of antegrade and reflected waves, their interaction as quantified by the Augmentation Index (AIx), and wave intensity, expressed as the ratio of the S and D peak intensities (SDR). Results: Overall, 78 HFrEF patients (ejection fraction (EF) 28+/-9%) and 78 controls (EF 66+/-8%), matched for sex, age, presence of hypertension and diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were included. All waveform parameters were statistically different between patients and controls. In ROC analysis, HFrEF patients and controls could be separated best using LVETi (AUC 0.897, p<0.0001) and SDR (AUC 0.911, p<0.0001). In newly diagnosed and treated HFrEF patients, the AUC for discrimination between HFrEF patients from controls was almost ideal (0.978, p<0.0001), when a combination of LVETi and SDR was used. Finally, in 46 HFrEF patients with available follow up data, concordance analysis showed a high agreement of up to 0.8 between changes in the cardiac function (eg., using EF) and changes in several waveform parameters. Conclusions: Pulse waveform parameters may be useful for screening and follow-up of patients with HFrEF.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), TU Wien (AT), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen (AT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.