Standard and imaging flow cytometry for environmental microplastic detection: progress, challenges, and future directions

Microplastics are pervasive environmental contaminants of increasing ecological concern. Despite substantial advances in analytical techniques, reliable microplastic detection remains challenging due to their small size, physicochemical heterogeneity, and close resemblance to natural particles. Additionally, many conventional detection techniques are inherently slow, low-throughput, or limited in their ability to detect the smallest and most environmentally relevant microplastics. Standard flow cytometry is emerging as a complementary approach for microplastic detection, offering rapid, high-throughput, multiparametric analysis with high sensitivity for identifying small particles. Imaging flow cytometry offers these capabilities while incorporating image acquisition to enable morphological characterisation and visual confirmation of microplastics. Despite this potential, the application of both techniques to environmental microplastic analysis remains relatively underexplored. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of standard and imaging flow cytometry for environmental microplastic detection, examining stain-based and stain-free workflows and highlighting the complementary strengths of each approach. We critically compare the performance, advantages, limitations, and applications of both techniques alongside microscopy, spectroscopy, imaging, and thermo-analytical methods. Particular emphasis is placed on the environmental and methodological factors influencing detection and the remaining challenges associated with applying these techniques to environmental samples. Finally, emerging technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, spectral flow cytometry, and hybrid analytical approaches, are discussed as future directions for improving the sensitivity, robustness, and broader environmental applicability of both techniques. Together, these developments have the potential to support the integration of standard and imaging flow cytometry into future environmental microplastic monitoring workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00217-1
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standard and imaging flow cytometry for environmental microplastic detection: progress, challenges, and future directions

Giles Best, James G. Mitchell, James Paterson, Abbey Hutton et al.
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Standard and imaging flow cytometry for environmental microplastic detection: progress, challenges, and future directions

Giles Best, James G. Mitchell, James Paterson, Abbey Hutton, Jessica A. P. Carlson-Jones, A.B. Tarasenko, Georgina H. Tilly-Scholes
article en

Abstract

Microplastics are pervasive environmental contaminants of increasing ecological concern. Despite substantial advances in analytical techniques, reliable microplastic detection remains challenging due to their small size, physicochemical heterogeneity, and close resemblance to natural particles. Additionally, many conventional detection techniques are inherently slow, low-throughput, or limited in their ability to detect the smallest and most environmentally relevant microplastics. Standard flow cytometry is emerging as a complementary approach for microplastic detection, offering rapid, high-throughput, multiparametric analysis with high sensitivity for identifying small particles. Imaging flow cytometry offers these capabilities while incorporating image acquisition to enable morphological characterisation and visual confirmation of microplastics. Despite this potential, the application of both techniques to environmental microplastic analysis remains relatively underexplored. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of standard and imaging flow cytometry for environmental microplastic detection, examining stain-based and stain-free workflows and highlighting the complementary strengths of each approach. We critically compare the performance, advantages, limitations, and applications of both techniques alongside microscopy, spectroscopy, imaging, and thermo-analytical methods. Particular emphasis is placed on the environmental and methodological factors influencing detection and the remaining challenges associated with applying these techniques to environmental samples. Finally, emerging technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, spectral flow cytometry, and hybrid analytical approaches, are discussed as future directions for improving the sensitivity, robustness, and broader environmental applicability of both techniques. Together, these developments have the potential to support the integration of standard and imaging flow cytometry into future environmental microplastic monitoring workflows.

Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Flinders University (AU), South Australian Water Corporation (AU)
Flinders University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.