A multi-scale assessment of topographic anisotropy on Land Surface Emissivity and Temperature retrieval over the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin

Accurate Land Surface Temperature (LST) retrieval is critical for monitoring cryospheric and hydrological processes, yet standard algorithms often fail in rugged terrain by neglecting directional Land Surface Emissivity (LSE) effects. This study quantified the impact of terrain-induced LSE anisotropy on LST estimation across the topographically complex Yarlung Tsangpo River Basin (YTRB). We integrated multi-source remote sensing data with an empirical directional emissivity model and a generalized single-channel LST algorithm, explicitly evaluating the sensitivity of the topographic correction to the LSE/LST spatial scale and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) fidelity. Results reveal a strong scale dependence: while terrain-induced biases are negligible at coarse scales (~5 km), they become substantial at finer resolutions. At a 250 m resolution, LSE biases on steep slopes (>50°), which represent critical areas for cryospheric dynamics, reached ~0.02, propagating into LST errors exceeding 1.5 K. Crucially, the fidelity of the input DEM governs the magnitude of the correction. Our sensitivity analysis revealed that emissivity adjustments derived from a high-resolution (30 m) DEM were 2–3 times greater in magnitude than those derived from a coarser DEM (1 km) on moderate slopes (30°–50°). Quantitative analysis further demonstrates that topographic correction effectively eliminates the pseudo-correlation between emissivity and slope (R2 reduced from 0.055 to 0.0036). Notably, both LSE and LST biases exhibit a statistically significant exponential growth relationship with the Terrain Ruggedness Index (TRI) (R2 ≈0.75), identifying TRI, rather than absolute elevation, as the dominant control on thermal anisotropy. This study provides a comprehensive basin-scale, multi-resolution quantification of how emissivity anisotropy distorts LST estimates. These findings highlight that high-fidelity topographic correction is strongly recommended for minimizing systematic errors in hydro-climatic modelling, offering a quantitative framework for improving the physical consistency of next-generation thermal products over complex terrain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2026.2710368
Primary Topic
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-scale assessment of topographic anisotropy on Land Surface Emissivity and Temperature retrieval over the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin

Xingwang Fan, Rufat Guluzade, Hongjun Zhu, Jie Yuan et al.
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
article

A multi-scale assessment of topographic anisotropy on Land Surface Emissivity and Temperature retrieval over the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin

Xingwang Fan, Rufat Guluzade, Hongjun Zhu, Jie Yuan, Zi Yang, Kevin Tansey, Zhenwei Wang, Suyi Liu, Shanhu Jiang, Xin Pan, Yingbao Yang, Matthew Payne
article en

Abstract

Accurate Land Surface Temperature (LST) retrieval is critical for monitoring cryospheric and hydrological processes, yet standard algorithms often fail in rugged terrain by neglecting directional Land Surface Emissivity (LSE) effects. This study quantified the impact of terrain-induced LSE anisotropy on LST estimation across the topographically complex Yarlung Tsangpo River Basin (YTRB). We integrated multi-source remote sensing data with an empirical directional emissivity model and a generalized single-channel LST algorithm, explicitly evaluating the sensitivity of the topographic correction to the LSE/LST spatial scale and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) fidelity. Results reveal a strong scale dependence: while terrain-induced biases are negligible at coarse scales (~5 km), they become substantial at finer resolutions. At a 250 m resolution, LSE biases on steep slopes (>50°), which represent critical areas for cryospheric dynamics, reached ~0.02, propagating into LST errors exceeding 1.5 K. Crucially, the fidelity of the input DEM governs the magnitude of the correction. Our sensitivity analysis revealed that emissivity adjustments derived from a high-resolution (30 m) DEM were 2–3 times greater in magnitude than those derived from a coarser DEM (1 km) on moderate slopes (30°–50°). Quantitative analysis further demonstrates that topographic correction effectively eliminates the pseudo-correlation between emissivity and slope (R2 reduced from 0.055 to 0.0036). Notably, both LSE and LST biases exhibit a statistically significant exponential growth relationship with the Terrain Ruggedness Index (TRI) (R2 ≈0.75), identifying TRI, rather than absolute elevation, as the dominant control on thermal anisotropy. This study provides a comprehensive basin-scale, multi-resolution quantification of how emissivity anisotropy distorts LST estimates. These findings highlight that high-fidelity topographic correction is strongly recommended for minimizing systematic errors in hydro-climatic modelling, offering a quantitative framework for improving the physical consistency of next-generation thermal products over complex terrain.

International Journal of Remote Sensing
University of Leicester (GB), Hohai University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Royal Society, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.