Assessing the applicability of the ICAO carbon emissions calculator at a Chinese plateau airport using operational data

Abstract The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Carbon Emissions Calculator (ICEC) is widely recognized as an authoritative tool for estimating aviation carbon footprints. However, its globally averaged static assumptions have not been systematically tested in regionally specific operational environments. This study takes Kunming Changshui International Airport (ZPPP)—a high-altitude hub in southwestern China—as a case study and empirically evaluates ICEC’s mapping mechanisms in a regional context using full‑year 2023 operational data from 113,937 flights. The results show that ICEC’s static distance correction does not capture the pronounced directional asymmetry and seasonal variation driven by the mid‑latitude westerly jet and its seasonal intensification. In summer, severe convective weather further induces high daily dispersion in flight times. Regarding emission allocation, passenger load factors exhibit directional asymmetry and seasonal patterns. The average body weight of Chinese adult passengers is approximately 30% lower than ICEC’s default value, and the increased proportion of children during holiday periods further reduces the average passenger mass. Cargo loads show extreme directional imbalance and significant heterogeneity across airlines. These multi‑level biases interact and accumulate, leading to systematic deviations in per‑passenger emission estimates depending on season, route, and airline. This study demonstrates that ICEC’s static assumptions, built upon globally averaged parameters, may produce multidimensional systematic biases when applied to the complex operational environment of a high-altitude airport in China. We recommend that future improvements to international carbon accounting tools introduce direction‑dependent distance corrections, dynamic load parameters, and region-specific passenger mass factors to enhance the fairness and scientific accuracy of emission calculations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-64547-z
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the applicability of the ICAO carbon emissions calculator at a Chinese plateau airport using operational data

Rui Liang, Lin Zou, Jingtao Wang, Jianxiong Chen et al.
Scientific Reports
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Assessing the applicability of the ICAO carbon emissions calculator at a Chinese plateau airport using operational data

Rui Liang, Lin Zou, Jingtao Wang, Jianxiong Chen, Licong Cao
article en

Abstract

Abstract The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Carbon Emissions Calculator (ICEC) is widely recognized as an authoritative tool for estimating aviation carbon footprints. However, its globally averaged static assumptions have not been systematically tested in regionally specific operational environments. This study takes Kunming Changshui International Airport (ZPPP)—a high-altitude hub in southwestern China—as a case study and empirically evaluates ICEC’s mapping mechanisms in a regional context using full‑year 2023 operational data from 113,937 flights. The results show that ICEC’s static distance correction does not capture the pronounced directional asymmetry and seasonal variation driven by the mid‑latitude westerly jet and its seasonal intensification. In summer, severe convective weather further induces high daily dispersion in flight times. Regarding emission allocation, passenger load factors exhibit directional asymmetry and seasonal patterns. The average body weight of Chinese adult passengers is approximately 30% lower than ICEC’s default value, and the increased proportion of children during holiday periods further reduces the average passenger mass. Cargo loads show extreme directional imbalance and significant heterogeneity across airlines. These multi‑level biases interact and accumulate, leading to systematic deviations in per‑passenger emission estimates depending on season, route, and airline. This study demonstrates that ICEC’s static assumptions, built upon globally averaged parameters, may produce multidimensional systematic biases when applied to the complex operational environment of a high-altitude airport in China. We recommend that future improvements to international carbon accounting tools introduce direction‑dependent distance corrections, dynamic load parameters, and region-specific passenger mass factors to enhance the fairness and scientific accuracy of emission calculations.

Scientific Reports
Civil Aviation Flight University of China (CN)
Civil Aviation Administration of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.