Functional Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Preservation rhinoplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to structural rhinoplasty. However, concerns remain regarding potential nasal airway narrowing and the limited availability of objective postoperative functional data. Objectives and Hypotheses: To review and analyse current studies assessing functional outcomes of preservation rhinoplasty, with or without comparison to structural rhinoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta analysis of functional outcomes in preservation rhinoplasty. METHODS: A comprehensive database search identified studies using key words. Eligible studies that were included reported original quantitative data using validated functional outcome measures (NOSE, SCHNOS-O, VAS-F, SNOT-22, or rhinometry). RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (n = 2058) met inclusion criteria. Controlled studies showed no significant difference between preservation and structural rhinoplasty outcomes, while uncontrolled studies demonstrated postoperative improvement from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation and structural rhinoplasty yield comparable functional results, both significantly improving validated patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Facial Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2927-6789
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yves Saban, Anil Joshi, Alexander S. North, Hamid Reza Khademi Mansour et al.
Facial Plastic Surgery
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Functional Outcomes of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yves Saban, Anil Joshi, Alexander S. North, Hamid Reza Khademi Mansour, Chelsea Chan
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preservation rhinoplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to structural rhinoplasty. However, concerns remain regarding potential nasal airway narrowing and the limited availability of objective postoperative functional data. Objectives and Hypotheses: To review and analyse current studies assessing functional outcomes of preservation rhinoplasty, with or without comparison to structural rhinoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta analysis of functional outcomes in preservation rhinoplasty. METHODS: A comprehensive database search identified studies using key words. Eligible studies that were included reported original quantitative data using validated functional outcome measures (NOSE, SCHNOS-O, VAS-F, SNOT-22, or rhinometry). RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (n = 2058) met inclusion criteria. Controlled studies showed no significant difference between preservation and structural rhinoplasty outcomes, while uncontrolled studies demonstrated postoperative improvement from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation and structural rhinoplasty yield comparable functional results, both significantly improving validated patient-reported outcome measures.

Facial Plastic Surgery
King's College London (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), St George's Hospital (GB), King's College School (GB), Fairfax County Public Schools (US), University Hospital Lewisham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.