Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction Versus Augmented Reconstruction: Where Do We Stand?

Medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries of the elbow have increased over the past 2 decades, particularly among adolescent and young adult overhead throwing athletes. Over time, operative techniques for MUCL injuries have evolved, with the goals of improving time to return and rates of return to sport and meeting athlete-specific demands. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the state of surgical management of MUCL injuries, assessing indications, techniques, and outcomes. Surgical techniques reviewed included MUCL-augmented repair with internal bracing, traditional reconstruction, reconstruction augmented with internal bracing, and revision MUCL reconstruction. While MUCL reconstruction has been the gold standard of treatment, augmented reconstruction and repair techniques have shown promising outcomes; these strategies emphasize anatomic restoration, preservation of native tissue, and individualized patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316261472449
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction Versus Augmented Reconstruction: Where Do We Stand?

Sophia Mavrommatis, Christopher L. Camp, Joshua S. Dines, Rakan R. Alshaibi
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction Versus Augmented Reconstruction: Where Do We Stand?

Sophia Mavrommatis, Christopher L. Camp, Joshua S. Dines, Rakan R. Alshaibi
article en

Abstract

Medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries of the elbow have increased over the past 2 decades, particularly among adolescent and young adult overhead throwing athletes. Over time, operative techniques for MUCL injuries have evolved, with the goals of improving time to return and rates of return to sport and meeting athlete-specific demands. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the state of surgical management of MUCL injuries, assessing indications, techniques, and outcomes. Surgical techniques reviewed included MUCL-augmented repair with internal bracing, traditional reconstruction, reconstruction augmented with internal bracing, and revision MUCL reconstruction. While MUCL reconstruction has been the gold standard of treatment, augmented reconstruction and repair techniques have shown promising outcomes; these strategies emphasize anatomic restoration, preservation of native tissue, and individualized patient selection.

HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.