Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction Versus Augmented Reconstruction: Where Do We Stand?
Medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries of the elbow have increased over the past 2 decades, particularly among adolescent and young adult overhead throwing athletes. Over time, operative techniques for MUCL injuries have evolved, with the goals of improving time to return and rates of return to sport and meeting athlete-specific demands. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the state of surgical management of MUCL injuries, assessing indications, techniques, and outcomes. Surgical techniques reviewed included MUCL-augmented repair with internal bracing, traditional reconstruction, reconstruction augmented with internal bracing, and revision MUCL reconstruction. While MUCL reconstruction has been the gold standard of treatment, augmented reconstruction and repair techniques have shown promising outcomes; these strategies emphasize anatomic restoration, preservation of native tissue, and individualized patient selection.
Authors
- Sophia Mavrommatis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-3475)
- Christopher L. Camp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-7327)
- Joshua S. Dines (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2135-9317)
- Rakan R. Alshaibi
Institutions
- Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
- Published
- 2026-07-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316261472449
- Primary Topic
- Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00