The European Parliament as a human rights champion? Legitimation practices in the DROI and LIBE committees

Over the years, the European Parliament has gained a reputation for promoting and protecting human rights within the European Union. In this article, I examine how human rights function as a legitimation resource in the EP’s interinstitutional relations. Drawing on 41 interviews with MEPs and staff from DROI and LIBE, I offer a novel framework of three human rights-related legitimation practices. While the EP makes extensive use of all three practices, their application varies depending on legislative competences and issue salience. I further demonstrate that the effectiveness of human rights legitimation depends critically on how the practices interact: When coherently deployed they compound each other into a powerful legitimation claim, but when the EP’s output falls short of its stated standards they risk contradicting each other. Whether rooted in genuine commitment or strategic calculation, human rights legitimation has tangible implications for the Parliament’s institutional role vis-à-vis the Commission and Council.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2709581
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Parliament as a human rights champion? Legitimation practices in the DROI and LIBE committees

Marlene Joger
Journal of European Integration
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The European Parliament as a human rights champion? Legitimation practices in the DROI and LIBE committees

Marlene Joger
article en

Abstract

Over the years, the European Parliament has gained a reputation for promoting and protecting human rights within the European Union. In this article, I examine how human rights function as a legitimation resource in the EP’s interinstitutional relations. Drawing on 41 interviews with MEPs and staff from DROI and LIBE, I offer a novel framework of three human rights-related legitimation practices. While the EP makes extensive use of all three practices, their application varies depending on legislative competences and issue salience. I further demonstrate that the effectiveness of human rights legitimation depends critically on how the practices interact: When coherently deployed they compound each other into a powerful legitimation claim, but when the EP’s output falls short of its stated standards they risk contradicting each other. Whether rooted in genuine commitment or strategic calculation, human rights legitimation has tangible implications for the Parliament’s institutional role vis-à-vis the Commission and Council.

Journal of European Integration
University of Bamberg (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.