Era-specific prognostic factors and an interpretable machine-learning survival model for renal cell carcinoma brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with poor prognosis and limited clinical guidance. We aimed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in RCC BM and develop an interpretable machine-learning (ML) model for individualized risk prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 929 patients with histologically confirmed clear cell RCC BM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or surgical resection and stratified them by treatment era [interferons (IFN), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO)]. Univariate Cox regression analyses were carried out, and a prognostic classification tree was constructed for the IO era. ML analyses used a comprehensive survival modeling framework integrating multiple algorithms and ensemble strategies, with final model selection based on nested cross-validation performance and interpretation using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, and calibration metrics, and an interactive web-based calculator was developed. RESULTS: Median OS increased from 0.8 years in the IFN era to 1.1 years in the TKI era and 2.0 years in the IO era. The CoxNet (elastic net, α = 0.2) survival model achieved a C-index of 0.64, a 6-month AUC of 0.75, and a 95% confidence interval of 0.47-0.92 in the test cohort. Model interpretation identified extracranial disease status and age at BM intervention as the dominant predictors, with additional contributions from functional status and intracranial disease burden. Limitations include a lack of patient-level systemic therapy details, tumor volume measurements, and laboratory variables used in prior prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the largest cohort of patients with RCC BM and presents an interpretable ML model for individualized survival prediction to support clinical decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108300
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Era-specific prognostic factors and an interpretable machine-learning survival model for renal cell carcinoma brain metastases

Elshad Hasanov, D. Suki, P. Li, Z. Majeed et al.
ESMO Open
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Era-specific prognostic factors and an interpretable machine-learning survival model for renal cell carcinoma brain metastases

Elshad Hasanov, D. Suki, P. Li, Z. Majeed, Y. Acikgoz, E. Hasanov, S.D. Ferguson, S. Ozgul, E. Jonasch, Z.F. Akpinar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with poor prognosis and limited clinical guidance. We aimed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in RCC BM and develop an interpretable machine-learning (ML) model for individualized risk prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 929 patients with histologically confirmed clear cell RCC BM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or surgical resection and stratified them by treatment era [interferons (IFN), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO)]. Univariate Cox regression analyses were carried out, and a prognostic classification tree was constructed for the IO era. ML analyses used a comprehensive survival modeling framework integrating multiple algorithms and ensemble strategies, with final model selection based on nested cross-validation performance and interpretation using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, and calibration metrics, and an interactive web-based calculator was developed. RESULTS: Median OS increased from 0.8 years in the IFN era to 1.1 years in the TKI era and 2.0 years in the IO era. The CoxNet (elastic net, α = 0.2) survival model achieved a C-index of 0.64, a 6-month AUC of 0.75, and a 95% confidence interval of 0.47-0.92 in the test cohort. Model interpretation identified extracranial disease status and age at BM intervention as the dominant predictors, with additional contributions from functional status and intracranial disease burden. Limitations include a lack of patient-level systemic therapy details, tumor volume measurements, and laboratory variables used in prior prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the largest cohort of patients with RCC BM and presents an interpretable ML model for individualized survival prediction to support clinical decision making.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(8)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR), The Ohio State University (US)
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.