Patient-centered communication and breast and cervical cancer screening in the US health information national trends survey

Objective: To examine the relationship between high-quality patient-centered communication (PCC) and breast and cervical cancer screening behaviors.Methods: We used the 2017–2020 cycles of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-5). Participants were asked to report the quality of PCC at past-year healthcare visits using a 7-item scale. We used survey-weighted Wald tests and multivariable logistic regression to evaluate differences in up-to-date (UTD) breast or cervical cancer screening by overall PCC and individual measures.Results: 7,040 participants were eligible, 79% of respondents reported high-quality PCC. High-quality PCC was positively associated with UTD breast cancer screening (86% vs. low-quality – 76%, p = .002). For UTD breast cancer screening, participants reporting they ‘understood the next steps’ was the most important single PCC item (86% vs. 70%, p = .002). There was a smaller difference by PCC overall for UTD cervical cancer screening (86% high-quality vs. 80% low-quality, p = .04), with reporting ‘feeling involved in decisions’ and that providers paid attention to ‘feelings and emotions’ individually significant.Conclusions: High-quality PCC was significantly associated with breast and cervical cancer screening. The association between quality PCC and screening use varies, with different communication items emerging for cervical and breast cancer screening, highlighting potential gaps in PCC screening approaches in primary care settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preventive Oncology & Epidemiology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28322134.2026.2710453
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-centered communication and breast and cervical cancer screening in the US health information national trends survey

Jennifer C. Spencer, Lailea Noel, Roba Abousaway, Hanwen Zhang
Preventive Oncology & Epidemiology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Patient-centered communication and breast and cervical cancer screening in the US health information national trends survey

Jennifer C. Spencer, Lailea Noel, Roba Abousaway, Hanwen Zhang
article en

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between high-quality patient-centered communication (PCC) and breast and cervical cancer screening behaviors.Methods: We used the 2017–2020 cycles of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-5). Participants were asked to report the quality of PCC at past-year healthcare visits using a 7-item scale. We used survey-weighted Wald tests and multivariable logistic regression to evaluate differences in up-to-date (UTD) breast or cervical cancer screening by overall PCC and individual measures.Results: 7,040 participants were eligible, 79% of respondents reported high-quality PCC. High-quality PCC was positively associated with UTD breast cancer screening (86% vs. low-quality – 76%, p = .002). For UTD breast cancer screening, participants reporting they ‘understood the next steps’ was the most important single PCC item (86% vs. 70%, p = .002). There was a smaller difference by PCC overall for UTD cervical cancer screening (86% high-quality vs. 80% low-quality, p = .04), with reporting ‘feeling involved in decisions’ and that providers paid attention to ‘feelings and emotions’ individually significant.Conclusions: High-quality PCC was significantly associated with breast and cervical cancer screening. The association between quality PCC and screening use varies, with different communication items emerging for cervical and breast cancer screening, highlighting potential gaps in PCC screening approaches in primary care settings.

Preventive Oncology & EpidemiologyVol. 4(1)
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.