Embedding psychological care in diabetes services: Why it's time to innovate and integrate

AIMS: This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on the psychological dimensions of diabetes care, identifies gaps in evidence and practice and proposes innovative pathways for embedding psychological care into routine diabetes services. METHODS: Drawing on the authors' expertise in diabetes and behavioral science, complemented by a semi-structured literature search, the review integrates findings from quantitative studies, qualitative research, clinical experience and lived experience perspectives. Evidence was analyzed across domains of care models, research and evaluation, implementation and policy and advances in person-reported outcome measurement. RESULTS: Psychological care in diabetes appears most effective when delivered through layered models: routine distress assessment, frontline psycho-education and access to specialist therapies when needed. Evidence suggests such approaches reduce distress and depressive symptoms, though glycaemic effects remain variable. Integration is constrained by structural barriers such as fragmented health systems, limited reimbursement and shortages of trained professionals. Scientific gaps include underrepresentation of older adults, migrant populations and rare diabetes subtypes, as well as a lack of longitudinal studies. Practical challenges (time pressures in clinics, digital inequality, stigma) further hinder uptake. Assessment issues also persist, with lengthy tools limiting routine use. Moving forward requires interdisciplinary and stepped/matched care models, inclusive and participatory research and policy frameworks that support reimbursement and workforce development. Advances in adaptive, streamlined and culturally sensitive measurement tools are essential to ensure psychological needs are systematically identified and addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological care is not a luxury in diabetes care but a core component of effective, person-centred practice, critical to achieving holistic, equitable and sustainable services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetic Medicine
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70411
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedding psychological care in diabetes services: Why it's time to innovate and integrate

Giesje Nefs, Per Winterdijk, Henk‐Jan Aanstoot, Christine Fransman et al.
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Embedding psychological care in diabetes services: Why it's time to innovate and integrate

Giesje Nefs, Per Winterdijk, Henk‐Jan Aanstoot, Christine Fransman, Andreia Mocan
article en

Abstract

AIMS: This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on the psychological dimensions of diabetes care, identifies gaps in evidence and practice and proposes innovative pathways for embedding psychological care into routine diabetes services. METHODS: Drawing on the authors' expertise in diabetes and behavioral science, complemented by a semi-structured literature search, the review integrates findings from quantitative studies, qualitative research, clinical experience and lived experience perspectives. Evidence was analyzed across domains of care models, research and evaluation, implementation and policy and advances in person-reported outcome measurement. RESULTS: Psychological care in diabetes appears most effective when delivered through layered models: routine distress assessment, frontline psycho-education and access to specialist therapies when needed. Evidence suggests such approaches reduce distress and depressive symptoms, though glycaemic effects remain variable. Integration is constrained by structural barriers such as fragmented health systems, limited reimbursement and shortages of trained professionals. Scientific gaps include underrepresentation of older adults, migrant populations and rare diabetes subtypes, as well as a lack of longitudinal studies. Practical challenges (time pressures in clinics, digital inequality, stigma) further hinder uptake. Assessment issues also persist, with lengthy tools limiting routine use. Moving forward requires interdisciplinary and stepped/matched care models, inclusive and participatory research and policy frameworks that support reimbursement and workforce development. Advances in adaptive, streamlined and culturally sensitive measurement tools are essential to ensure psychological needs are systematically identified and addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological care is not a luxury in diabetes care but a core component of effective, person-centred practice, critical to achieving holistic, equitable and sustainable services.

Diabetic Medicine
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Tilburg University (NL), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Diabetes UK (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.