Comparing Real-Time PCR and Amplicon-Based NGS for Routine EGFR Liquid Biopsy Profiling

Background: Sensitive detection of EGFR mutations in liquid biopsies of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) is vital for guiding targeted treatments. Real-time PCR offers a quick turnaround time but relatively low sensitivity while Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers broader EGFR coverage, co-mutation evaluation and high sensitivity. Methods: This study evaluated the amplicon-based NGS Plasma-SeqSensei™ Solid Cancer In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) Kit (Sysmex) against the real-time PCR-based cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche), the current routine standard at the Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS. We enrolled 130 patients with aNSCLC in the RARE Study between April 2022 and August 2025 who were referred to our institute. Liquid biopsies were taken at diagnosis or at progression and analyzed using two methods with the primary objective of assessing diagnostic concordance for EGFR profiling. Sysmex NGS libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 550 sequencer (Illumina), with the NextSeq 500/550 Mid Output Kit v2.5 (150 Cycles) in single-end mode. Results: Among 129 evaluable samples, the NGS assay demonstrated a marginally higher EGFR mutation detection rate, identifying mutations in 31/129 cases (24.0%, 95% CI: 17–33), versus 28/129 (21.7%, 95% CI: 15–30) by cobas, specifically for variants covered by both assays. Overall concordance was almost perfect (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80–0.98), confirming the high reliability of both methods. Furthermore, we identified a cfDNA input threshold of at least 20 ng as critical for ensuring optimal assay sensitivity and reliable mutation detection (Odds Ratio = 4.41 for inputs ≥ 20 ng, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Ultimately, the Sysmex NGS proved to be a robust and highly sensitive assay. It delivers performance comparable to that of standard RT-PCR while providing the clinical advantage of concurrently detecting a broader spectrum of EGFR variants and actionable mutations in other genes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152392
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Real-Time PCR and Amplicon-Based NGS for Routine EGFR Liquid Biopsy Profiling

Stefano Indraccolo, Valentina Guarneri, Valeria Tosello, S. Longo et al.
Diagnostics
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Comparing Real-Time PCR and Amplicon-Based NGS for Routine EGFR Liquid Biopsy Profiling

Stefano Indraccolo, Valentina Guarneri, Valeria Tosello, S. Longo, Elisa Masetto, Laura Bonanno, Andrea Boscolo Bragadin, Paola Del Bianco, Giulia Pasello, Alessia Padovan, Francesco Callegarin, Sara Baldissin
article en

Abstract

Background: Sensitive detection of EGFR mutations in liquid biopsies of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) is vital for guiding targeted treatments. Real-time PCR offers a quick turnaround time but relatively low sensitivity while Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers broader EGFR coverage, co-mutation evaluation and high sensitivity. Methods: This study evaluated the amplicon-based NGS Plasma-SeqSensei™ Solid Cancer In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) Kit (Sysmex) against the real-time PCR-based cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche), the current routine standard at the Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS. We enrolled 130 patients with aNSCLC in the RARE Study between April 2022 and August 2025 who were referred to our institute. Liquid biopsies were taken at diagnosis or at progression and analyzed using two methods with the primary objective of assessing diagnostic concordance for EGFR profiling. Sysmex NGS libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 550 sequencer (Illumina), with the NextSeq 500/550 Mid Output Kit v2.5 (150 Cycles) in single-end mode. Results: Among 129 evaluable samples, the NGS assay demonstrated a marginally higher EGFR mutation detection rate, identifying mutations in 31/129 cases (24.0%, 95% CI: 17–33), versus 28/129 (21.7%, 95% CI: 15–30) by cobas, specifically for variants covered by both assays. Overall concordance was almost perfect (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80–0.98), confirming the high reliability of both methods. Furthermore, we identified a cfDNA input threshold of at least 20 ng as critical for ensuring optimal assay sensitivity and reliable mutation detection (Odds Ratio = 4.41 for inputs ≥ 20 ng, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Ultimately, the Sysmex NGS proved to be a robust and highly sensitive assay. It delivers performance comparable to that of standard RT-PCR while providing the clinical advantage of concurrently detecting a broader spectrum of EGFR variants and actionable mutations in other genes.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(15)
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.