Behavioral Ontology Part 2: An Algebra of Dynamic Behavioral Ontology

A companion paper, Behavioral Ontology: A General Theory of Declarative Automation (Argibay, 2026), defines a formal system for specifying the behavioral ontology of automated systems through five orthogonal components and establishes that the resulting specification language is context-free. This paper develops the algebraic structure that those specifications admit. It defines two equivalence relations on Dynamic Behavioral Ontology (DBO) specifications — structural equivalence (isomorphism) and behavioral equivalence (identical outcomes under identical conditions) — and shows that the latter is the natural equivalence for intent-level comparison. It defines a partial order (the subset relation), two binary operations (difference and union), and a normalization procedure for composed specifications. It proposes that these structures form the foundation of a formal algebra of DBO, providing tools for comparing systems across implementations, certifying that modifications preserve intent, and establishing when two apparently different systems are, at the level of intent, the same. This is a first draft; the formal proofs and completeness results remain to be developed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Review
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67486/tsr.2026.7
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral Ontology Part 2: An Algebra of Dynamic Behavioral Ontology

Jorge L. Argibay
The Scientific Review
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Behavioral Ontology Part 2: An Algebra of Dynamic Behavioral Ontology

Jorge L. Argibay
article en

Abstract

A companion paper, Behavioral Ontology: A General Theory of Declarative Automation (Argibay, 2026), defines a formal system for specifying the behavioral ontology of automated systems through five orthogonal components and establishes that the resulting specification language is context-free. This paper develops the algebraic structure that those specifications admit. It defines two equivalence relations on Dynamic Behavioral Ontology (DBO) specifications — structural equivalence (isomorphism) and behavioral equivalence (identical outcomes under identical conditions) — and shows that the latter is the natural equivalence for intent-level comparison. It defines a partial order (the subset relation), two binary operations (difference and union), and a normalization procedure for composed specifications. It proposes that these structures form the foundation of a formal algebra of DBO, providing tools for comparing systems across implementations, certifying that modifications preserve intent, and establishing when two apparently different systems are, at the level of intent, the same. This is a first draft; the formal proofs and completeness results remain to be developed.

The Scientific Review
Software (Spain) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.