Audit Committee Effectiveness, Institutional Ownership, and Climate Change Disclosure: Evidence From European Firms

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between audit committee (AC) effectiveness and climate change disclosure (CCD) and investigates the moderating role of institutional ownership in this relationship. The study used a sample of 3896 firm‐year observations from 14 European countries over the period 2017–2024. We measure AC effectiveness through its individual characteristics: size, independence, financial expertise, gender diversity, and meeting frequency. CCD attributes are assessed using firms' responses to Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) questionnaires. The results show that effective ACs significantly enhance the level, quality, and transparency of CCD. Furthermore, institutional ownership strengthens these associations, highlighting the complementary roles of internal and external governance forces in promoting sustainability accountability. Robustness analyses reveal that AC attributes have a stronger impact on CCD in environmentally sensitive industries, and this effect is further enhanced by the presence of long‐term institutional investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71360
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audit Committee Effectiveness, Institutional Ownership, and Climate Change Disclosure: Evidence From European Firms

Foued Khlifi, Israa Dahmen
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Audit Committee Effectiveness, Institutional Ownership, and Climate Change Disclosure: Evidence From European Firms

Foued Khlifi, Israa Dahmen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between audit committee (AC) effectiveness and climate change disclosure (CCD) and investigates the moderating role of institutional ownership in this relationship. The study used a sample of 3896 firm‐year observations from 14 European countries over the period 2017–2024. We measure AC effectiveness through its individual characteristics: size, independence, financial expertise, gender diversity, and meeting frequency. CCD attributes are assessed using firms' responses to Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) questionnaires. The results show that effective ACs significantly enhance the level, quality, and transparency of CCD. Furthermore, institutional ownership strengthens these associations, highlighting the complementary roles of internal and external governance forces in promoting sustainability accountability. Robustness analyses reveal that AC attributes have a stronger impact on CCD in environmentally sensitive industries, and this effect is further enhanced by the presence of long‐term institutional investors.

Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Sfax (TN), University of Gabès (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.