Response: LAP Critical Issues-July 2026

The historical, empirical and theoretical matters raised in this commentary are developed in my Epochal Crisis: The Exhaustion of Global Capitalism (Robinson, 2026).This is important because the commentary is not intended to be theoretically or historically satisfying to an academic audience.LAP founding editor Ron Chilcote asked me after the 2025 talk to write up my notes into a commentary for a new section of the journal that this essay would inaugurate.I am not concerned with revisiting here debate on my theory of global capitalism that has been going on for three decades.For that, readers can reference numerous exchanges and symposia.The presentation in question was an análisis de coyuntura.As Leiva notes, the aim is to present the "big picture" in a few pages.It would have been interesting for the commentaries to engage more with the coyuntura that I discussed and the case examples from around Latin America that I identified.Boito says that my thesis on a transnational capitalist class "denies the existence of national factions of the bourgeoisie in conflict with one another," asks how we can explain the aggravation of conflicts between nation-states if not by the conflict among national capitalist classes, and calls for abandoning the concept of a transnational capitalist class.I have responded at great length to the notion that world capitalism is still organized along the lines of national capitalist classes in conflict with one another.I am not interested in revisiting that debate here.What is important now is the relationship of transnational capital to the national state and whether or not my theory of global capitalism can explain the current escalation of interstate and geopolitical conflict.A major portion of the book on which the first part of the essay is based, Epochal Crisis, shows precisely that the theory can convincingly explain this conflict.I show how, as the crisis deepens, politics is coming to overdetermine economics, or to say this another way, the political interests of states are coming to trump the economic interests of transnational capitalists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Latin American Perspectives
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x261467403
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response: LAP Critical Issues-July 2026

William I. Robinson
Latin American Perspectives
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
article

Response: LAP Critical Issues-July 2026

William I. Robinson
article en

Abstract

The historical, empirical and theoretical matters raised in this commentary are developed in my Epochal Crisis: The Exhaustion of Global Capitalism (Robinson, 2026).This is important because the commentary is not intended to be theoretically or historically satisfying to an academic audience.LAP founding editor Ron Chilcote asked me after the 2025 talk to write up my notes into a commentary for a new section of the journal that this essay would inaugurate.I am not concerned with revisiting here debate on my theory of global capitalism that has been going on for three decades.For that, readers can reference numerous exchanges and symposia.The presentation in question was an análisis de coyuntura.As Leiva notes, the aim is to present the "big picture" in a few pages.It would have been interesting for the commentaries to engage more with the coyuntura that I discussed and the case examples from around Latin America that I identified.Boito says that my thesis on a transnational capitalist class "denies the existence of national factions of the bourgeoisie in conflict with one another," asks how we can explain the aggravation of conflicts between nation-states if not by the conflict among national capitalist classes, and calls for abandoning the concept of a transnational capitalist class.I have responded at great length to the notion that world capitalism is still organized along the lines of national capitalist classes in conflict with one another.I am not interested in revisiting that debate here.What is important now is the relationship of transnational capital to the national state and whether or not my theory of global capitalism can explain the current escalation of interstate and geopolitical conflict.A major portion of the book on which the first part of the essay is based, Epochal Crisis, shows precisely that the theory can convincingly explain this conflict.I show how, as the crisis deepens, politics is coming to overdetermine economics, or to say this another way, the political interests of states are coming to trump the economic interests of transnational capitalists.

Latin American Perspectives
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.