Cross-Classification of Digital Tools and Learning Contexts for Safety Education and Training in Agriculture

Agriculture is one of the most hazardous occupational sectors, with conventional safety training often suffering from limited realism, low engagement, and reduced opportunities to reproduce hazardous scenarios safely. This article provides a structured analysis of digital and technology-enhanced approaches for safety education and training in agriculture. A literature-based framework was developed by combining five groups of digital tools—immersive technologies, simulators and digital twins, serious games and gamification, e-learning systems, and AI-based educational tools—with five learning contexts: formal education, vocational education and training, apprenticeships and traineeships, lifelong and on-the-job learning, and peer or community-based learning. In addition, a heuristic Application Priority Score (APS) was proposed to assess each technology–context combination according to evidence availability, cost–benefit feasibility, technology–learner fit, and inclusivity/accessibility. The results show that evidence is unevenly distributed, with stronger attention to immersive technologies, simulation-based approaches, and game-based learning in formal education, whereas lifelong, on-the-job, and peer/community learning remain less explored. The scoring framework also indicates that no single digital tool is universally suitable: the most promising solutions depend on the training context, learner experience, implementation costs, and accessibility barriers. The study provides a context-sensitive framework to support future research and the design of more inclusive and effective digital safety training solutions in agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16151634
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Farm Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Classification of Digital Tools and Learning Contexts for Safety Education and Training in Agriculture

Elisa Mariotti, Danilo Monarca, Elisa Cioccolo
Agriculture
Agriculture and Farm Safety
article

Cross-Classification of Digital Tools and Learning Contexts for Safety Education and Training in Agriculture

Elisa Mariotti, Danilo Monarca, Elisa Cioccolo
article en

Abstract

Agriculture is one of the most hazardous occupational sectors, with conventional safety training often suffering from limited realism, low engagement, and reduced opportunities to reproduce hazardous scenarios safely. This article provides a structured analysis of digital and technology-enhanced approaches for safety education and training in agriculture. A literature-based framework was developed by combining five groups of digital tools—immersive technologies, simulators and digital twins, serious games and gamification, e-learning systems, and AI-based educational tools—with five learning contexts: formal education, vocational education and training, apprenticeships and traineeships, lifelong and on-the-job learning, and peer or community-based learning. In addition, a heuristic Application Priority Score (APS) was proposed to assess each technology–context combination according to evidence availability, cost–benefit feasibility, technology–learner fit, and inclusivity/accessibility. The results show that evidence is unevenly distributed, with stronger attention to immersive technologies, simulation-based approaches, and game-based learning in formal education, whereas lifelong, on-the-job, and peer/community learning remain less explored. The scoring framework also indicates that no single digital tool is universally suitable: the most promising solutions depend on the training context, learner experience, implementation costs, and accessibility barriers. The study provides a context-sensitive framework to support future research and the design of more inclusive and effective digital safety training solutions in agriculture.

AgricultureVol. 16(15)
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Agriculture and Farm Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.