Challenges with interviewer administration of EQ-5D questionnaires in a large-scale population survey in China: a qualitative analysis

INTRODUCTION: While most adult measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are designed for self-completion, their use in low- and middle-income countries involves interviewer administration. Large-scale population surveys in China that collect EQ-5D data via face-to-face interviews typically show high ceiling effects. We aimed to identify non-standard interviewing approaches in the collection of EQ-5D data in a large-scale population health survey in China and to explore reasons for these non-standard approaches and plausible mechanisms through which these deviations may influence EQ-5D response patterns. METHODS: A random sample of routinely recorded interviews from population health surveys in Nanjing, China were thematically analysed to identify interviewing approaches to collecting EQ-5D-3L. Focus group discussions with ten interviewers were used to explore the reasons for those approaches. RESULTS: Six non-standard interviewing approaches were identified: skipping questions; altering question wording; combining multiple dimensions into one question; altering response options; selecting responses based on interviewer interpretation of respondent's narrative; and not asking the interviewee any questions. Three main reasons motivated these non-standard approaches: (a) comprehension and response challenges among low-literacy respondents; (b) survey structure, including overall length, positioning of EQ-5D questions and respondent burden leading to time-saving interview strategies; (c) limited interviewer knowledge of self-reported health measures, including a tendency to view EQ-5D as an observer-assessed instrument. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight challenges in interviewer administration of the EQ-5D in large-scale population surveys. The non-standard approaches observed may affect data quality, potentially contribute to ceiling effects, and complicate the interpretation of these data being 'self-reported'. Providing training on EQ-5D data collection to interviewers may be a first step to strengthening data collection processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality of Life Research
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04351-4
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges with interviewer administration of EQ-5D questionnaires in a large-scale population survey in China: a qualitative analysis

Tianxin Pan, Xin Hong, Zhuxin Mao, Nan Luo et al.
Quality of Life Research
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Challenges with interviewer administration of EQ-5D questionnaires in a large-scale population survey in China: a qualitative analysis

Tianxin Pan, Xin Hong, Zhuxin Mao, Nan Luo, Nancy Devlin, Chao Li, Jie Wu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While most adult measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are designed for self-completion, their use in low- and middle-income countries involves interviewer administration. Large-scale population surveys in China that collect EQ-5D data via face-to-face interviews typically show high ceiling effects. We aimed to identify non-standard interviewing approaches in the collection of EQ-5D data in a large-scale population health survey in China and to explore reasons for these non-standard approaches and plausible mechanisms through which these deviations may influence EQ-5D response patterns. METHODS: A random sample of routinely recorded interviews from population health surveys in Nanjing, China were thematically analysed to identify interviewing approaches to collecting EQ-5D-3L. Focus group discussions with ten interviewers were used to explore the reasons for those approaches. RESULTS: Six non-standard interviewing approaches were identified: skipping questions; altering question wording; combining multiple dimensions into one question; altering response options; selecting responses based on interviewer interpretation of respondent's narrative; and not asking the interviewee any questions. Three main reasons motivated these non-standard approaches: (a) comprehension and response challenges among low-literacy respondents; (b) survey structure, including overall length, positioning of EQ-5D questions and respondent burden leading to time-saving interview strategies; (c) limited interviewer knowledge of self-reported health measures, including a tendency to view EQ-5D as an observer-assessed instrument. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight challenges in interviewer administration of the EQ-5D in large-scale population surveys. The non-standard approaches observed may affect data quality, potentially contribute to ceiling effects, and complicate the interpretation of these data being 'self-reported'. Providing training on EQ-5D data collection to interviewers may be a first step to strengthening data collection processes.

Quality of Life ResearchVol. 35(9)
University of Antwerp (BE), The University of Melbourne (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control And Prevention (CN), National University Health System (SG), Melbourne Health (AU)
University of Melbourne
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.