Navigating AI Errors: The Role of Mental Models in Human-AI Team Performance

Performance of human-AI teams depends on both AI’s overall accuracy and human’s ability to detect errors and form an accurate understanding of system behaviors. Little prior research has compared how different patterns of AI errors (i.e., when and how they occur) shapes users’ mental models that underpin human oversight. To address this gap, we conducted an online experiment ( N = 380) exploring how error patterns influence individuals’ ability to detect AI errors and develop effective mental models of system accuracy in a phishing email classification task. Our findings demonstrate that while different error patterns did not significantly influence participants’ ability to detect AI errors, it shaped their perceptions of how the AI performed over the interaction. This work demonstrates that error pattern effects are more evident in users’ interpretations of system behavior than in their detection performance. This distinction advances theoretical models of monitoring and mental model development in AI-supported decision environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261475166
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating AI Errors: The Role of Mental Models in Human-AI Team Performance

Danielle Sanchez, Joe Edd Ingram, Caitlin Lancaster, Paul Schutte et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Navigating AI Errors: The Role of Mental Models in Human-AI Team Performance

Danielle Sanchez, Joe Edd Ingram, Caitlin Lancaster, Paul Schutte, Lauren Treiman, Todd Bruner, Emily Winokur
article en

Abstract

Performance of human-AI teams depends on both AI’s overall accuracy and human’s ability to detect errors and form an accurate understanding of system behaviors. Little prior research has compared how different patterns of AI errors (i.e., when and how they occur) shapes users’ mental models that underpin human oversight. To address this gap, we conducted an online experiment ( N = 380) exploring how error patterns influence individuals’ ability to detect AI errors and develop effective mental models of system accuracy in a phishing email classification task. Our findings demonstrate that while different error patterns did not significantly influence participants’ ability to detect AI errors, it shaped their perceptions of how the AI performed over the interaction. This work demonstrates that error pattern effects are more evident in users’ interpretations of system behavior than in their detection performance. This distinction advances theoretical models of monitoring and mental model development in AI-supported decision environments.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Princeton University (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Laboratory Directed Research and Development
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.