“It’s getting better all the time”: News avoidance and optimistic assessment as correlates of support for enacting extreme policies in war

Despite the important role of media coverage in conflict and war, limited research attention has empirically and systematically examined the association between news consumption and attitudes in conflict. This study, in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the Israel–Hamas war, focuses on a specific pattern of news-consumption – avoidance of mainstream news. It examines how Jewish–Israeli avoidance of mainstream news during the war and optimistic assessments of the current situation in Israel are associated with support for Israel enacting extreme, militant policies in war. The authors’ analysis is based on a representative sample of Israeli-Jews ( N = 901) obtained through public-opinion polling. As expected, mainstream news-avoidance and optimistic assessments of the current situation were positively associated with increased Jewish-Israeli support for militant policies. The association between news-avoidance and increased support for militant policies was partly mediated by optimistic assessments of the current situation of Israel. Together, news avoidance and optimistic assessments of the current situation explained significant variance in support for militant policies ( R 2 = .31).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media War & Conflict
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352261466076
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It’s getting better all the time”: News avoidance and optimistic assessment as correlates of support for enacting extreme policies in war

Ifat Maoz, Tal Orian Harel, Inbar Illouz
Media War & Conflict
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

“It’s getting better all the time”: News avoidance and optimistic assessment as correlates of support for enacting extreme policies in war

Ifat Maoz, Tal Orian Harel, Inbar Illouz
article en

Abstract

Despite the important role of media coverage in conflict and war, limited research attention has empirically and systematically examined the association between news consumption and attitudes in conflict. This study, in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the Israel–Hamas war, focuses on a specific pattern of news-consumption – avoidance of mainstream news. It examines how Jewish–Israeli avoidance of mainstream news during the war and optimistic assessments of the current situation in Israel are associated with support for Israel enacting extreme, militant policies in war. The authors’ analysis is based on a representative sample of Israeli-Jews ( N = 901) obtained through public-opinion polling. As expected, mainstream news-avoidance and optimistic assessments of the current situation were positively associated with increased Jewish-Israeli support for militant policies. The association between news-avoidance and increased support for militant policies was partly mediated by optimistic assessments of the current situation of Israel. Together, news avoidance and optimistic assessments of the current situation explained significant variance in support for militant policies ( R 2 = .31).

Media War & Conflict
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.