Ten recommendations for improving the study of executive functions in sport and exercise

Research on executive functions (EFs) has gained increasing attention in sport and exercise science and psychology. While EFs are widely discussed for their potential to enhance athletic performance, the direct evidence remains inconclusive due to methodological inconsistencies, conceptual ambiguity, and limited ecological validity in current research designs. This article addresses these challenges by offering ten recommendations and methodological guidelines for future EF research in sport and exercise contexts. It advocates for the use of standardized definitions, the development of ecologically valid and sport-relevant tasks, and the inclusion of diverse participant populations, while emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration. The article also highlights key gaps, such as the weak causal evidence linking EF training to performance outcomes, and the variability of such effects across populations. By integrating evidence-based guidance with theoretical insights, the proposed recommendations aim to support rigorous, interdisciplinary, and applied EF research with greater translational value for sport and exercise psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2026.2710156
Primary Topic
Genetics and Physical Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten recommendations for improving the study of executive functions in sport and exercise

Lisa-Marie Schütz, Philip Furley, Greg Wood, Liis Uiga et al.
International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Genetics and Physical Performance
article

Ten recommendations for improving the study of executive functions in sport and exercise

Lisa-Marie Schütz, Philip Furley, Greg Wood, Liis Uiga, Jack Brimmell
article en

Abstract

Research on executive functions (EFs) has gained increasing attention in sport and exercise science and psychology. While EFs are widely discussed for their potential to enhance athletic performance, the direct evidence remains inconclusive due to methodological inconsistencies, conceptual ambiguity, and limited ecological validity in current research designs. This article addresses these challenges by offering ten recommendations and methodological guidelines for future EF research in sport and exercise contexts. It advocates for the use of standardized definitions, the development of ecologically valid and sport-relevant tasks, and the inclusion of diverse participant populations, while emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration. The article also highlights key gaps, such as the weak causal evidence linking EF training to performance outcomes, and the variability of such effects across populations. By integrating evidence-based guidance with theoretical insights, the proposed recommendations aim to support rigorous, interdisciplinary, and applied EF research with greater translational value for sport and exercise psychology.

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), German Sport University Cologne (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Worcester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetics and Physical Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.