Beyond Greek and Latin: Theological Meaning in Early Georgian, Christian Palestinian Aramaic, and Geʽez Biblical Translation

This article examines early Georgian, Christian Palestinian Aramaic, and Geʽez biblical translation as forms of theological interpretation rather than as secondary witnesses to Greek and Latin Christianity. Each tradition emerged within a distinct cultural and ecclesial environment, yet all three demonstrate that translation shaped Christian identity, doctrine, liturgy, textual memory, and the reception of scripture. The Georgian tradition reflects layered interaction among Greek, Armenian, Syriac, and Byzantine influences. Christian Palestinian Aramaic preserves the multilingual character of Palestinian Christianity and survives largely through fragmentary palimpsests. The Geʽez tradition became the foundation of an enduring African Christian civilisation and preserved a distinctive biblical canon, including texts lost or marginalised elsewhere. The article argues that translation does not merely transfer meaning. It also interprets, selects, revises, and creates theological vocabulary. These traditions therefore belong at the centre of early Christian history because they reveal how scripture became local without surrendering its universal claim.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21701180
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Greek and Latin: Theological Meaning in Early Georgian, Christian Palestinian Aramaic, and Geʽez Biblical Translation

Daniel James Grace
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

Beyond Greek and Latin: Theological Meaning in Early Georgian, Christian Palestinian Aramaic, and Geʽez Biblical Translation

Daniel James Grace
article en

Abstract

This article examines early Georgian, Christian Palestinian Aramaic, and Geʽez biblical translation as forms of theological interpretation rather than as secondary witnesses to Greek and Latin Christianity. Each tradition emerged within a distinct cultural and ecclesial environment, yet all three demonstrate that translation shaped Christian identity, doctrine, liturgy, textual memory, and the reception of scripture. The Georgian tradition reflects layered interaction among Greek, Armenian, Syriac, and Byzantine influences. Christian Palestinian Aramaic preserves the multilingual character of Palestinian Christianity and survives largely through fragmentary palimpsests. The Geʽez tradition became the foundation of an enduring African Christian civilisation and preserved a distinctive biblical canon, including texts lost or marginalised elsewhere. The article argues that translation does not merely transfer meaning. It also interprets, selects, revises, and creates theological vocabulary. These traditions therefore belong at the centre of early Christian history because they reveal how scripture became local without surrendering its universal claim.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.