Comparative evaluation of seven severity grading systems in pediatric oral food challenges: Distinctions between anaphylactic and non-anaphylactic reactions

Background Multiple severity scoring systems exist for classifying reactions during OFCs; however, the lack of uniformity among them results in inconsistent identification and management of anaphylaxis. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and severity of anaphylactic and non-anaphylactic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) in children and to compare the concordance and discrepancies among 7 different severity scoring systems. Methods In this single-center, retrospective, and observational study, positive OFCs were retrospectively graded using 7 different severity classification systems. The concordance and discrepancies among the classification systems, including the World Allergy Organization (WAO) 2024 criteria, the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11), and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) classifications, were evaluated. Results Of the 1901 OFCs performed on 855 patients, 344 (18.1%) were positive, and among these, 61 (17.7%) were classified as anaphylactic reactions. Patients with anaphylactic reactions were significantly older than those with non-anaphylactic reactions (median age: 27 months vs. 15 months; p < 0.001). Using the WAO2024 criteria as the reference standard, both ICD-11 and EAACI classifications showed 100% sensitivity, while specificity for all systems ranged from 86.2% to 99.3%. Discrepancies among severity scoring systems were primarily due to differences in the interpretation of gastrointestinal manifestations. EAACI showed the most favorable balance between sensitivity and specificity, whereas CoFAR and Dribin demonstrated the highest specificity. Conclusion The findings emphasize the need for a harmonized severity classification system that is applicable in both clinical practice and research. Such standardization would enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve the management of food allergies in children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Allergy Organization Journal
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101433
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of seven severity grading systems in pediatric oral food challenges: Distinctions between anaphylactic and non-anaphylactic reactions

Sibel Balcı, Taha DEMİRCİ, Metin Aydoğan, Işıl Eser Şimşek et al.
World Allergy Organization Journal
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Comparative evaluation of seven severity grading systems in pediatric oral food challenges: Distinctions between anaphylactic and non-anaphylactic reactions

Sibel Balcı, Taha DEMİRCİ, Metin Aydoğan, Işıl Eser Şimşek, Mebrure Yazıcı, Müjde Tuba Çöğürlü, Yusuf Ziya Varlı, Nezihe Nefise Uluc, Dondu Ceren Kaval, Nagihan İskender, Mehmet Serkan Erkan, İsmail Özanlı, Taha Yasin Akın
article en

Abstract

Background Multiple severity scoring systems exist for classifying reactions during OFCs; however, the lack of uniformity among them results in inconsistent identification and management of anaphylaxis. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and severity of anaphylactic and non-anaphylactic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) in children and to compare the concordance and discrepancies among 7 different severity scoring systems. Methods In this single-center, retrospective, and observational study, positive OFCs were retrospectively graded using 7 different severity classification systems. The concordance and discrepancies among the classification systems, including the World Allergy Organization (WAO) 2024 criteria, the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11), and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) classifications, were evaluated. Results Of the 1901 OFCs performed on 855 patients, 344 (18.1%) were positive, and among these, 61 (17.7%) were classified as anaphylactic reactions. Patients with anaphylactic reactions were significantly older than those with non-anaphylactic reactions (median age: 27 months vs. 15 months; p < 0.001). Using the WAO2024 criteria as the reference standard, both ICD-11 and EAACI classifications showed 100% sensitivity, while specificity for all systems ranged from 86.2% to 99.3%. Discrepancies among severity scoring systems were primarily due to differences in the interpretation of gastrointestinal manifestations. EAACI showed the most favorable balance between sensitivity and specificity, whereas CoFAR and Dribin demonstrated the highest specificity. Conclusion The findings emphasize the need for a harmonized severity classification system that is applicable in both clinical practice and research. Such standardization would enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve the management of food allergies in children.

World Allergy Organization JournalVol. 19(8)
Sakarya University (TR), Sakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.