Discrepancy Between Eligibility and Practice: A 14-Year Nationwide Study on Curative Resection in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Background/Objectives: The 2026 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) update recommends surgical resection for a single hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 2 cm with preserved liver function and states that age alone should not preclude surgery. How often eligible older patients undergo resection, and how they fare, remains unquantified. Methods: Using the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry (2008–2021), we identified 3374 patients meeting all registry-based eligibility criteria of the 2026 BCLC update. Survival was measured from the date of radiological diagnosis in every patient, with vital status and cause of death obtained by linkage to national death records. We compared use of resection and survival among patients younger than 75 years and those 75 years or older, and across resection, ablation, other treatment, and no treatment, using Cox regression, restricted mean survival time (RMST), and competing-risk models. Results: Resection was performed in 60.6% of patients younger than 75 years versus 28.9% of those 75 years or older (p < 0.001); among older patients not undergoing resection, 21.5% received none. Older age was independently associated with lower odds of resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.28–0.46; p < 0.001). In this age group, 5-year survival was 61.3%, 62.1%, 32.9%, and 6.5% across the four treatment categories; the adjusted hazard ratio for no treatment versus resection was 4.97 (95% CI 3.26–7.57; p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, mean survival within the first 5 years was 13.3 months longer after resection (RMST difference, 95% CI 9.7–16.9; p < 0.001). Findings were consistent in competing-risk, weighted, cirrhosis-adjusted, and multiply imputed analyses. Conclusions: Older patients meeting eligibility criteria underwent resection far less often than younger patients, and a substantial minority received none, a pattern associated with markedly shorter survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18152457
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancy Between Eligibility and Practice: A 14-Year Nationwide Study on Curative Resection in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Jun Sik Yoon, Young Lee, Sun Woong Kim, Heejoon Jang
Cancers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Discrepancy Between Eligibility and Practice: A 14-Year Nationwide Study on Curative Resection in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Jun Sik Yoon, Young Lee, Sun Woong Kim, Heejoon Jang
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The 2026 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) update recommends surgical resection for a single hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 2 cm with preserved liver function and states that age alone should not preclude surgery. How often eligible older patients undergo resection, and how they fare, remains unquantified. Methods: Using the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry (2008–2021), we identified 3374 patients meeting all registry-based eligibility criteria of the 2026 BCLC update. Survival was measured from the date of radiological diagnosis in every patient, with vital status and cause of death obtained by linkage to national death records. We compared use of resection and survival among patients younger than 75 years and those 75 years or older, and across resection, ablation, other treatment, and no treatment, using Cox regression, restricted mean survival time (RMST), and competing-risk models. Results: Resection was performed in 60.6% of patients younger than 75 years versus 28.9% of those 75 years or older (p < 0.001); among older patients not undergoing resection, 21.5% received none. Older age was independently associated with lower odds of resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.28–0.46; p < 0.001). In this age group, 5-year survival was 61.3%, 62.1%, 32.9%, and 6.5% across the four treatment categories; the adjusted hazard ratio for no treatment versus resection was 4.97 (95% CI 3.26–7.57; p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, mean survival within the first 5 years was 13.3 months longer after resection (RMST difference, 95% CI 9.7–16.9; p < 0.001). Findings were consistent in competing-risk, weighted, cirrhosis-adjusted, and multiply imputed analyses. Conclusions: Older patients meeting eligibility criteria underwent resection far less often than younger patients, and a substantial minority received none, a pattern associated with markedly shorter survival.

CancersVol. 18(15)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), Seoul Medical Center (KR), Veterans Health Service Medical Center (KR), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.