Nutrition Behaviour During Pregnancy: Eating Twice as Healthy? A Secondary Analysis of the Nutrition Component of the NELIP Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Objectives: To examine adherence to the specific goals of the nutrition component of a healthy lifestyle intervention program during pregnancy (the Nutrition and Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program; NELIP) from baseline at 12–18 weeks gestation to trial midpoint (24–25 weeks gestation) and endpoint (34–36 weeks gestation). Methods: A convenience sample of 90 individuals were included in the secondary analysis. Participants completed the pregnancy intervention in one of three groups: NE, nutrition and exercise introduced simultaneously; N+E, nutrition introduced first followed by exercise introduced at midpoint; or E+N, exercise introduced first followed by nutrition introduced at midpoint. A meal plan with guidelines for carbohydrate and protein consumption was included in the nutrition component, and adherence to the specific meal plan goals was tracked using a novel rubric developed especially for the meal plan in the NELIP intervention. Results: All groups had improvements in nutrition adherence from baseline to midpoint, with the NE group scoring highest in adherence (12.9 ± 2.0 points) at midpoint compared to the N+E (11.2 ± 1.8 points) and E+N (11.8 ± 2.0 points) groups (F(2, 85) = 6.08, p = 0.00, η2 = 0.13). From midpoint to endpoint, N+E was the only group with no decline in adherence. Conclusions: The N+E group had the most stable improvements in adherence over the course of the intervention, despite better improvements in adherence from baseline to midpoint in groups NE and E+N. Time of intervention component introduction may have a differential impact on adherence score fluctuation, with baseline nutrition scores potentially influencing nutrition habits over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18152473
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutrition Behaviour During Pregnancy: Eating Twice as Healthy? A Secondary Analysis of the Nutrition Component of the NELIP Randomized Controlled Trial

Karishma Hosein, Michelle F. Mottola, Roberta Bgeginski, Harry Prapavessis et al.
Nutrients
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Nutrition Behaviour During Pregnancy: Eating Twice as Healthy? A Secondary Analysis of the Nutrition Component of the NELIP Randomized Controlled Trial

Karishma Hosein, Michelle F. Mottola, Roberta Bgeginski, Harry Prapavessis, Isabelle Giroux, Taniya S. Nagpal
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To examine adherence to the specific goals of the nutrition component of a healthy lifestyle intervention program during pregnancy (the Nutrition and Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program; NELIP) from baseline at 12–18 weeks gestation to trial midpoint (24–25 weeks gestation) and endpoint (34–36 weeks gestation). Methods: A convenience sample of 90 individuals were included in the secondary analysis. Participants completed the pregnancy intervention in one of three groups: NE, nutrition and exercise introduced simultaneously; N+E, nutrition introduced first followed by exercise introduced at midpoint; or E+N, exercise introduced first followed by nutrition introduced at midpoint. A meal plan with guidelines for carbohydrate and protein consumption was included in the nutrition component, and adherence to the specific meal plan goals was tracked using a novel rubric developed especially for the meal plan in the NELIP intervention. Results: All groups had improvements in nutrition adherence from baseline to midpoint, with the NE group scoring highest in adherence (12.9 ± 2.0 points) at midpoint compared to the N+E (11.2 ± 1.8 points) and E+N (11.8 ± 2.0 points) groups (F(2, 85) = 6.08, p = 0.00, η2 = 0.13). From midpoint to endpoint, N+E was the only group with no decline in adherence. Conclusions: The N+E group had the most stable improvements in adherence over the course of the intervention, despite better improvements in adherence from baseline to midpoint in groups NE and E+N. Time of intervention component introduction may have a differential impact on adherence score fluctuation, with baseline nutrition scores potentially influencing nutrition habits over time.

NutrientsVol. 18(15)
Western University (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Children’s Health Research Institute (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.