Effect of sellar and parasellar brain tumors on retinal thickness and visual fields: A cross-sectional comparative study

PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness, and visual field parameters in patients with sellar and parasellar brain tumors and to evaluate their associations with tumor size. METHODS: This hospital-based cross-sectional comparative study was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary care center. Patients aged 12-60 years with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed sellar or parasellar tumors underwent best-corrected visual acuity assessment, automated perimetry (Humphrey 30-2), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for RNFL and GCC analysis. Tumor size was recorded from MRI. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (31 sellar, 36 parasellar) were analyzed. Superior quadrant RNFL thickness in the right eye was significantly reduced in sellar tumors ( P = 0.029). Parasellar tumors were significantly larger in size ( P < 0.001). Tumor size showed significant associations with visual acuity and visual field indices in sellar tumors but not in parasellar tumors. CONCLUSION: Sellar tumors were associated with more consistent structural and functional visual impairment compared with parasellar tumors despite a smaller mean tumour size likely due to early chiasmal compression. RNFL thinning on optical coherence tomography may reflect early structural involvement of the optic pathway and may complement automated perimetry and neuroimaging in clinical evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_215_26
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of sellar and parasellar brain tumors on retinal thickness and visual fields: A cross-sectional comparative study

Aseem Kumar, Shivani Shrivastava, Harika D Kasireddy, Anil Sharma et al.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
article

Effect of sellar and parasellar brain tumors on retinal thickness and visual fields: A cross-sectional comparative study

Aseem Kumar, Shivani Shrivastava, Harika D Kasireddy, Anil Sharma, Vijaya Sahu
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness, and visual field parameters in patients with sellar and parasellar brain tumors and to evaluate their associations with tumor size. METHODS: This hospital-based cross-sectional comparative study was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary care center. Patients aged 12-60 years with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed sellar or parasellar tumors underwent best-corrected visual acuity assessment, automated perimetry (Humphrey 30-2), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for RNFL and GCC analysis. Tumor size was recorded from MRI. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (31 sellar, 36 parasellar) were analyzed. Superior quadrant RNFL thickness in the right eye was significantly reduced in sellar tumors ( P = 0.029). Parasellar tumors were significantly larger in size ( P < 0.001). Tumor size showed significant associations with visual acuity and visual field indices in sellar tumors but not in parasellar tumors. CONCLUSION: Sellar tumors were associated with more consistent structural and functional visual impairment compared with parasellar tumors despite a smaller mean tumour size likely due to early chiasmal compression. RNFL thinning on optical coherence tomography may reflect early structural involvement of the optic pathway and may complement automated perimetry and neuroimaging in clinical evaluation.

Indian Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 74(8)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.