Camera Angle and Terrain Homogeneity in WiSAR Visual Search

In Wilderness Search and Rescue (WiSAR), organizations are increasingly using Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) to reduce personnel exposure and search time. There exists a gap in knowledge of how sensor angles affect human performance in WiSAR environments. To study this, naturalistic stimuli were gathered from wilderness scenes at angles of 70° and 90°, in both homogeneous and distinct scenes, with a human target present or absent. Fifteen participants completed a visual search task, serving as imagery analysts and completing 10 trials per condition. Results indicated that overall accuracy was moderate (66%). While there were no significant main effects of scene type or angle, a significant interaction between these factors occurred in the target-present condition. These findings highlight the complexity of WiSAR visual search and the importance of analyzing human performance in this environment. The observed interaction suggests that the impact of camera angle on detection performance may be modulated by terrain characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261475157
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Camera Angle and Terrain Homogeneity in WiSAR Visual Search

Jeremiah D. Still, Donald J. Seeterlin
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Camera Angle and Terrain Homogeneity in WiSAR Visual Search

Jeremiah D. Still, Donald J. Seeterlin
article en

Abstract

In Wilderness Search and Rescue (WiSAR), organizations are increasingly using Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) to reduce personnel exposure and search time. There exists a gap in knowledge of how sensor angles affect human performance in WiSAR environments. To study this, naturalistic stimuli were gathered from wilderness scenes at angles of 70° and 90°, in both homogeneous and distinct scenes, with a human target present or absent. Fifteen participants completed a visual search task, serving as imagery analysts and completing 10 trials per condition. Results indicated that overall accuracy was moderate (66%). While there were no significant main effects of scene type or angle, a significant interaction between these factors occurred in the target-present condition. These findings highlight the complexity of WiSAR visual search and the importance of analyzing human performance in this environment. The observed interaction suggests that the impact of camera angle on detection performance may be modulated by terrain characteristics.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.