When leaders are real, do colleagues still compete? Unpacking the envy–gossip–knowledge chain

Purpose The main aim of this study was to explore how coworker competitiveness shapes knowledge-hiding behaviour in knowledge-intensive sectors, focusing on the mediating roles of being envied at work and perceived negative workplace gossip and the moderating influence of authentic leadership. Design/methodology/approach Data were gathered from a 2-wave survey of 228 professionals in India's information technology (IT) and banking sectors and analysed through the lens of social comparison theory and conservation of resources theory. Findings The analysis revealed that coworker competitiveness did not directly predict knowledge hiding or envy, but it significantly reduced negative workplace gossip. Gossip, rather than envy, emerged as the key relational mechanism driving knowledge hiding. Authentic leadership does not moderate these dynamics, suggesting that leadership interventions alone may not neutralise competitive tensions. Originality/value This research advances theory by demonstrating that competitiveness in structured, high-pressure environments can coexist with cooperation and may even suppress gossip. It reframes gossip as the critical link between rivalry and knowledge withholding in organisational behaviour literature. Practically, the findings underscore the need for team-level and cultural interventions beyond leadership training to foster open knowledge exchange.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-01-2026-0006
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When leaders are real, do colleagues still compete? Unpacking the envy–gossip–knowledge chain

Shalini Srivastava, Aastha Tripathi, Swati Dhir
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

When leaders are real, do colleagues still compete? Unpacking the envy–gossip–knowledge chain

Shalini Srivastava, Aastha Tripathi, Swati Dhir
article en

Abstract

Purpose The main aim of this study was to explore how coworker competitiveness shapes knowledge-hiding behaviour in knowledge-intensive sectors, focusing on the mediating roles of being envied at work and perceived negative workplace gossip and the moderating influence of authentic leadership. Design/methodology/approach Data were gathered from a 2-wave survey of 228 professionals in India's information technology (IT) and banking sectors and analysed through the lens of social comparison theory and conservation of resources theory. Findings The analysis revealed that coworker competitiveness did not directly predict knowledge hiding or envy, but it significantly reduced negative workplace gossip. Gossip, rather than envy, emerged as the key relational mechanism driving knowledge hiding. Authentic leadership does not moderate these dynamics, suggesting that leadership interventions alone may not neutralise competitive tensions. Originality/value This research advances theory by demonstrating that competitiveness in structured, high-pressure environments can coexist with cooperation and may even suppress gossip. It reframes gossip as the critical link between rivalry and knowledge withholding in organisational behaviour literature. Practically, the findings underscore the need for team-level and cultural interventions beyond leadership training to foster open knowledge exchange.

Leadership & Organization Development Journal
International Management Institute (IN), Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN), International Management Institute (BE), Tata Institute of Social Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.