How Do Gender‐Diverse Boards Strengthen Sustainability Compensation Incentives? Evidence on the Moderating Role of Internal Audit and <scp>GRI</scp> Reporting

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether board gender diversity is associated with stronger Sustainability Compensation Incentives and whether internal audit reporting and GRI Report Guidelines strengthen this relationship. Rather than treating the international setting only as a source of data, this study places cross‐country institutional variation at the centre of the analysis. It argues that national governance regimes, legal traditions, ESG disclosure norms, and gender‐diversity pressures shape whether gender‐diverse boards can translate stakeholder‐oriented preferences into enforceable sustainability compensation incentives. The study uses a global firm‐year panel drawn from Refinitiv Eikon (LSEG) covering 2012–2023; the study applies fixed effects regression with governance and firm‐level controls. To address endogeneity, GMM and 2SLS are employed. Robustness tests include Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, panel‐corrected standard errors, lagged independent variables, and additional controls. The findings show that board gender diversity is positively related to SCIS, suggesting that gender‐diverse boards are associated with more formalized and transparent sustainability compensation structures. Internal audit reporting and GRI reporting are also positively associated with SCIS; however, GRI reporting does not significantly moderate the diversity–SCIS relationship. Although most baseline, endogeneity, and robustness tests support the positive diversity–SCIS association, the coefficient becomes insignificant under Driscoll–Kraay estimation, indicating more conservative inference when cross‐sectional dependence is addressed. The study shows that board diversity and internal audit reporting function as complementary governance reforms and identifies internal audit reporting quality as a key mechanism through which gender‐diverse boards enhance sustainability compensation architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thunderbird International Business Review
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.70150
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Gender‐Diverse Boards Strengthen Sustainability Compensation Incentives? Evidence on the Moderating Role of Internal Audit and GRI Reporting

Muhammad Mubeen, Saira Arshad, Amna Arshad, Hafiz Muhammad Arslan
Thunderbird International Business Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

How Do Gender‐Diverse Boards Strengthen Sustainability Compensation Incentives? Evidence on the Moderating Role of Internal Audit and GRI Reporting

Muhammad Mubeen, Saira Arshad, Amna Arshad, Hafiz Muhammad Arslan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether board gender diversity is associated with stronger Sustainability Compensation Incentives and whether internal audit reporting and GRI Report Guidelines strengthen this relationship. Rather than treating the international setting only as a source of data, this study places cross‐country institutional variation at the centre of the analysis. It argues that national governance regimes, legal traditions, ESG disclosure norms, and gender‐diversity pressures shape whether gender‐diverse boards can translate stakeholder‐oriented preferences into enforceable sustainability compensation incentives. The study uses a global firm‐year panel drawn from Refinitiv Eikon (LSEG) covering 2012–2023; the study applies fixed effects regression with governance and firm‐level controls. To address endogeneity, GMM and 2SLS are employed. Robustness tests include Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, panel‐corrected standard errors, lagged independent variables, and additional controls. The findings show that board gender diversity is positively related to SCIS, suggesting that gender‐diverse boards are associated with more formalized and transparent sustainability compensation structures. Internal audit reporting and GRI reporting are also positively associated with SCIS; however, GRI reporting does not significantly moderate the diversity–SCIS relationship. Although most baseline, endogeneity, and robustness tests support the positive diversity–SCIS association, the coefficient becomes insignificant under Driscoll–Kraay estimation, indicating more conservative inference when cross‐sectional dependence is addressed. The study shows that board diversity and internal audit reporting function as complementary governance reforms and identifies internal audit reporting quality as a key mechanism through which gender‐diverse boards enhance sustainability compensation architecture.

Thunderbird International Business Review
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), GIFT University (PK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.