The Rise of Midocracy: How <scp>NPM</scp> and Post‐ <scp>NPM</scp> Reform Ideas Recombine in Contemporary Public Organizations

ABSTRACT This paper introduces and conceptualizes midocracy as an emergent organizational form in the public sector, characterized by the growth and dominance of a professionalized administrative middle layer. The study argues that midocracy draws on elements associated with both New Public Management (NPM) and post‐NPM reform agendas. While administration is essential for coordination, we show how its unchecked expansion can lead to self‐reinforcing dynamics that distance governance from core operations. Midocracy, we contend, reflects a shift from service delivery to symbolic value signaling, strategic abstraction, and polycentric goal‐setting. Our contribution is both conceptual and diagnostic, offering midocracy as a framework for understanding contemporary administrative expansion and its implications for public sector legitimacy and performance. Finally, we relate and critically examine different explanatory accounts of administrative expansion, highlighting how they interact within the dynamics of midocracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70166
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rise of Midocracy: How NPM and Post‐ NPM Reform Ideas Recombine in Contemporary Public Organizations

Johan Alvehus, Gustaf Kastberg Weichselberger
Public Administration Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

The Rise of Midocracy: How NPM and Post‐ NPM Reform Ideas Recombine in Contemporary Public Organizations

Johan Alvehus, Gustaf Kastberg Weichselberger
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper introduces and conceptualizes midocracy as an emergent organizational form in the public sector, characterized by the growth and dominance of a professionalized administrative middle layer. The study argues that midocracy draws on elements associated with both New Public Management (NPM) and post‐NPM reform agendas. While administration is essential for coordination, we show how its unchecked expansion can lead to self‐reinforcing dynamics that distance governance from core operations. Midocracy, we contend, reflects a shift from service delivery to symbolic value signaling, strategic abstraction, and polycentric goal‐setting. Our contribution is both conceptual and diagnostic, offering midocracy as a framework for understanding contemporary administrative expansion and its implications for public sector legitimacy and performance. Finally, we relate and critically examine different explanatory accounts of administrative expansion, highlighting how they interact within the dynamics of midocracy.

Public Administration Review
Lund University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.