Field evaluation of 3-(N-acetyl-n-butyl) aminopropionic acid ethyl ester - IR3535 as a spatial repellent to control malaria: A Randomised, Before-After-Control-Intervention trial

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Increasing mosquito resistance to insecticides can significantly limit current vector control strategies. Spatial repellents represent a promising complementary tool by disrupting mosquito human-seeking behaviour. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IR3535 as a spatial repellent in Tambai, a high-transmission rural area in central Mozambique. METHODS: This was a randomised, Before-After-Control-Intervention trial. Four Tambai blocks were randomly selected, with 40 households randomly assigned to receive IR3535 spraying and 40 assigned to as a no-repellent control group. Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence was estimated in children under 5 years of age using polymerase chain reaction, before, at year one and at year two. Data were first analysed using frequentist methods and subsequently using spatiotemporal Bayesian models, incorporating INLA-based models to assess the impact of repellent intervention on mosquito density and diversity, sporozoite rates, and malaria prevalence in the repellent and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 5716 mosquitoes were collected, 57.2% were Anopheles and 42.7% were Culex sp.. An. funestus s.l. females, were the most prevalent mosquito both indoor (92.7%) and outdoor (82.5%), followed by An. gambiae and An. tenebrosus. The total number of An. funestus s.l. females was lower in the repellent group compared with the control group [indoors: 765 vs 1,432; outdoors: 175 vs 293], as was the average number of mosquitoes collected per household [indoors: 18.6 vs 35.0; outdoors: 4.3 vs 7.1]. Spatiotemporal analysis revealed evidence of repellent-associated reduction in mosquito densities, with species-specific and indoor-outdoor differences, highlighting An. funestus s.l. dominance and spatial-temporal clustering patterns. P. falciparum prevalence among children under five declined from 72.6% (95% CI = 64.1-80.2) at baseline to 51.3% (95% CI = 43.5-59.1) at year one and 43.3% (95% CI = 35.7-51.1) at the end of the study, with similar reductions in both repellent and control groups. Sporozoite rates were slightly lower in the repellent group, particularly outdoors, however, these differences could not be directedly attributed to the repellent. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the use of IR3535 as a spatial repellent reduces indoor and outdoor malaria vector densities, which may contribute to reduced malaria transmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04419766.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353351
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field evaluation of 3-(N-acetyl-n-butyl) aminopropionic acid ethyl ester - IR3535 as a spatial repellent to control malaria: A Randomised, Before-After-Control-Intervention trial

Ana Paula Abílio, Henrique Silveira, João Luís Manuel, Nicole Azevedo et al.
PLoS ONE
Malaria Research and Control
article

Field evaluation of 3-(N-acetyl-n-butyl) aminopropionic acid ethyl ester - IR3535 as a spatial repellent to control malaria: A Randomised, Before-After-Control-Intervention trial

Ana Paula Abílio, Henrique Silveira, João Luís Manuel, Nicole Azevedo, Luis Filipe Lopes, Joaquim Lequechane, Luzia Gonçalves, Ana Bernardo Duajá
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Increasing mosquito resistance to insecticides can significantly limit current vector control strategies. Spatial repellents represent a promising complementary tool by disrupting mosquito human-seeking behaviour. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IR3535 as a spatial repellent in Tambai, a high-transmission rural area in central Mozambique. METHODS: This was a randomised, Before-After-Control-Intervention trial. Four Tambai blocks were randomly selected, with 40 households randomly assigned to receive IR3535 spraying and 40 assigned to as a no-repellent control group. Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence was estimated in children under 5 years of age using polymerase chain reaction, before, at year one and at year two. Data were first analysed using frequentist methods and subsequently using spatiotemporal Bayesian models, incorporating INLA-based models to assess the impact of repellent intervention on mosquito density and diversity, sporozoite rates, and malaria prevalence in the repellent and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 5716 mosquitoes were collected, 57.2% were Anopheles and 42.7% were Culex sp.. An. funestus s.l. females, were the most prevalent mosquito both indoor (92.7%) and outdoor (82.5%), followed by An. gambiae and An. tenebrosus. The total number of An. funestus s.l. females was lower in the repellent group compared with the control group [indoors: 765 vs 1,432; outdoors: 175 vs 293], as was the average number of mosquitoes collected per household [indoors: 18.6 vs 35.0; outdoors: 4.3 vs 7.1]. Spatiotemporal analysis revealed evidence of repellent-associated reduction in mosquito densities, with species-specific and indoor-outdoor differences, highlighting An. funestus s.l. dominance and spatial-temporal clustering patterns. P. falciparum prevalence among children under five declined from 72.6% (95% CI = 64.1-80.2) at baseline to 51.3% (95% CI = 43.5-59.1) at year one and 43.3% (95% CI = 35.7-51.1) at the end of the study, with similar reductions in both repellent and control groups. Sporozoite rates were slightly lower in the repellent group, particularly outdoors, however, these differences could not be directedly attributed to the repellent. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the use of IR3535 as a spatial repellent reduces indoor and outdoor malaria vector densities, which may contribute to reduced malaria transmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04419766.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
University of Lisbon (PT), Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences (PT), Instituto de Medicina Tropical (PY), Instituto Nacional de Saúde (MZ), Ministério da Saúde (ST), Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.