Shear Performance and Ultimate Bearing Capacity Calculation Methods for the Composite Shear Connector

Abstract This paper aims to explore the shear properties of the stud + perforated bar (PBL) and stud + arc-shaped reinforcement (ASR) composite shear connectors in steel-ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) composite structures; the failure patterns, shear stiffness, and ultimate bearing capacity are investigated; the effects of stud diameter, concrete strength, and thickness of the perforated steel plate and ASR diameter are analyzed. Results show that the two kinds of composite shear connectors present the stud yielding, and the UHPC slab surface exhibited one distinct vertical crack for the stud + PBL composite shear connector and two obvious vertical cracks for the stud + ASR composite shear connector. Both the shear stiffness and shear capacity of the stud + PBL composite shear connector change linearly with the stud diameter; however, quadratic and linear variation trends are presented for the thickness of perforated steel plate, respectively. The shear stiffness and shear capacity of the stud +ASR composite shear connector are dominantly controlled by the diameter of ASR when the diameter of the stud is smaller than that of the ASR. For the shear capacity, the factor of the stud diameter is greater than the thickness of the perforated steel plate for the stud +PBL composite shear connector, while the influence of the ASR diameter is greater than the stud diameter for the stud + ASR composite shear connector. The ductility of the stud +PBL composite shear connector is better than that of the stud + ASR composite shear connector. Calculation formulas for the shear bearing capacity of the two composite shear connectors are in good agreement with the test and finite element analysis results. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the interface optimization design of steel-UHPC composite structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-22537
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shear Performance and Ultimate Bearing Capacity Calculation Methods for the Composite Shear Connector

Zhaochao Li, Dan Zeng, Xuan Liu, Yang Liu et al.
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Shear Performance and Ultimate Bearing Capacity Calculation Methods for the Composite Shear Connector

Zhaochao Li, Dan Zeng, Xuan Liu, Yang Liu, Lei Cao, Xiaochen Luo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to explore the shear properties of the stud + perforated bar (PBL) and stud + arc-shaped reinforcement (ASR) composite shear connectors in steel-ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) composite structures; the failure patterns, shear stiffness, and ultimate bearing capacity are investigated; the effects of stud diameter, concrete strength, and thickness of the perforated steel plate and ASR diameter are analyzed. Results show that the two kinds of composite shear connectors present the stud yielding, and the UHPC slab surface exhibited one distinct vertical crack for the stud + PBL composite shear connector and two obvious vertical cracks for the stud + ASR composite shear connector. Both the shear stiffness and shear capacity of the stud + PBL composite shear connector change linearly with the stud diameter; however, quadratic and linear variation trends are presented for the thickness of perforated steel plate, respectively. The shear stiffness and shear capacity of the stud +ASR composite shear connector are dominantly controlled by the diameter of ASR when the diameter of the stud is smaller than that of the ASR. For the shear capacity, the factor of the stud diameter is greater than the thickness of the perforated steel plate for the stud +PBL composite shear connector, while the influence of the ASR diameter is greater than the stud diameter for the stud + ASR composite shear connector. The ductility of the stud +PBL composite shear connector is better than that of the stud + ASR composite shear connector. Calculation formulas for the shear bearing capacity of the two composite shear connectors are in good agreement with the test and finite element analysis results. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the interface optimization design of steel-UHPC composite structures.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 38(11)
Hunan University of Technology (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.