Cemiplimab and Fianlimab With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage High-Risk <i>ERBB2</i> -Negative Breast Cancer

Importance: Although adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes in high-risk early-stage breast cancer, opportunities remain to further enhance response. Dual checkpoint blockade offers a potential strategy to further enhance efficacy. Objective: To evaluate the combination of anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) cemiplimab and anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) added to neoadjuvant therapy in ERBB2-negative early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: The I-SPY2 (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2) is an ongoing randomized clinical platform trial being conducted at multiple US clinical sites including patients with early-stage (II or III) ERBB2-negative, high-risk breast cancer. Participants, continuously enrolled since 2010, were adaptively randomized from February 2, 2020, to December 9, 2021, to one of several experimental neoadjuvant therapies or control groups based on receptor subtypes defined by hormone receptor (HR), ERBB2 status, and MammaPrint (Agendia Inc) molecular risk, categorized as high (MP1) or ultrahigh (MP2). Data were analyzed from January 1, 2022, to August 5, 2025. Interventions: Both groups received weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks, then doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by surgery; concomitant with paclitaxel, the intervention group also received 4 doses of cemiplimab and fianlimab (PCF) every 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pathologic complete response (pCR). Treatments graduated when they achieved 85% bayesian probability of success in a subtype-specific phase 3 trial. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. Results: A total of 78 participants (mean [SD] age, 47 [39-54] years) were randomized to the intervention group, with 350 participants (mean [SD] age, 48 [39-57] years) randomized to the historical control population. PCF graduated in all clinical signatures, with pCR rates vs control of 44% (95% CI, 34%-53%) vs 21% (95% CI, 17%-25%) in all ERBB2, 53% (95% CI, 39%-67%) vs 29% (95% CI, 22%-36%) in triple-negative, and 36% (95% CI, 23%-49%) vs 14% (95% CI, 9%-19%) in HR-positive and ERBB2-negative disease. Among the total participants, 16 (21%) experienced adrenal insufficiency, including hypophysitis (11% grade 3 or 4), mostly occurring after immunotherapy completion. PCF was found to be highly effective in the subset of patients with immune signature positive status (ImPrint positive). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the combination of PD-1 and anti-LAG-3 inhibition with standard NAC was effective in early-stage ERBB2-negative breast cancer, particularly in patients displaying a positive ImPrint immune signature. These results warrant further definitive trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Oncology
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.2576
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cemiplimab and Fianlimab With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage High-Risk ERBB2 -Negative Breast Cancer

Carla Falkson, Angela M. DeMichele, Alexandra Thomas, Adam L. Asare et al.
JAMA Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Cemiplimab and Fianlimab With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage High-Risk ERBB2 -Negative Breast Cancer

Carla Falkson, Angela M. DeMichele, Alexandra Thomas, Adam L. Asare, Kay T. Yeung, Lamorna Brown Swigart, JC Boughey, Rachael Lancaster, Natalie Marshall, J Perlmutter, Amy Sanford, Amy L. Delson, Kathy S. Albain, Barbara LeStage, Christos Vaklavas, Jeffrey B. Matthews, C Yau, Meghna S. Trivedi, Gillian L. Hirst, Anthony Elias, Anne M. Wallace, Rita Nanda, Emily Douglas, Nicole O. Williams, Laura J. van ‘t Veer, Nola M. Hylton, Frederick M. Howard, W. Fraser Symmans, Hyo S. Han, Katia Khoury, Paula R. Pohlmann, Candace Mainor, Erica M. Stringer-Reasor, Lajos Pusztai, Amy S. Clark, Douglas Yee, Heather Beckwith, Mili Arora, Dawn L. Hershman, Laura C. Kennedy, Mei Wei, A. Jo Chien, Kevin M. Kalinsky, Nan Chen, Laura J. Esserman, Mariya Rozenblit, Julia E. McGuinness, Hope S. Rugo, Yunn-Yi Chen, Donald A. Berry, Claudine Isaacs
article en

Abstract

Importance: Although adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes in high-risk early-stage breast cancer, opportunities remain to further enhance response. Dual checkpoint blockade offers a potential strategy to further enhance efficacy. Objective: To evaluate the combination of anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) cemiplimab and anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) added to neoadjuvant therapy in ERBB2-negative early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: The I-SPY2 (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2) is an ongoing randomized clinical platform trial being conducted at multiple US clinical sites including patients with early-stage (II or III) ERBB2-negative, high-risk breast cancer. Participants, continuously enrolled since 2010, were adaptively randomized from February 2, 2020, to December 9, 2021, to one of several experimental neoadjuvant therapies or control groups based on receptor subtypes defined by hormone receptor (HR), ERBB2 status, and MammaPrint (Agendia Inc) molecular risk, categorized as high (MP1) or ultrahigh (MP2). Data were analyzed from January 1, 2022, to August 5, 2025. Interventions: Both groups received weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks, then doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by surgery; concomitant with paclitaxel, the intervention group also received 4 doses of cemiplimab and fianlimab (PCF) every 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pathologic complete response (pCR). Treatments graduated when they achieved 85% bayesian probability of success in a subtype-specific phase 3 trial. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. Results: A total of 78 participants (mean [SD] age, 47 [39-54] years) were randomized to the intervention group, with 350 participants (mean [SD] age, 48 [39-57] years) randomized to the historical control population. PCF graduated in all clinical signatures, with pCR rates vs control of 44% (95% CI, 34%-53%) vs 21% (95% CI, 17%-25%) in all ERBB2, 53% (95% CI, 39%-67%) vs 29% (95% CI, 22%-36%) in triple-negative, and 36% (95% CI, 23%-49%) vs 14% (95% CI, 9%-19%) in HR-positive and ERBB2-negative disease. Among the total participants, 16 (21%) experienced adrenal insufficiency, including hypophysitis (11% grade 3 or 4), mostly occurring after immunotherapy completion. PCF was found to be highly effective in the subset of patients with immune signature positive status (ImPrint positive). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the combination of PD-1 and anti-LAG-3 inhibition with standard NAC was effective in early-stage ERBB2-negative breast cancer, particularly in patients displaying a positive ImPrint immune signature. These results warrant further definitive trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.

JAMA Oncology
University of Minnesota (US), Mayo Clinic (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Georgetown University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), University of Utah (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Avera Health (US), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Yale University (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), University of Chicago Medical Center (US), Berry & Associates (United States) (US), City of Hope (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US), Breast Center (CH), Gemini Computers (United States) (US), Wake Forest University (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of California, Davis (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.