Inertial‐Range Energy Transfer Free From Isotropic Assumption in Turbulent Space Plasma

Abstract The idea of an energy cascade in the inertial range is often invoked in turbulent space plasmas to estimate the energy dissipation rate. Laws governing the behavior of third‐order structure functions in the inertial range, so‐called third‐order laws, are among the few rigorous theoretical results quantifying cross‐scale energy transfer. The widely used third‐order‐law derived rate assumes isotropy, which fundamentally conflicts with the anisotropic nature of space plasmas. Elementary questions persist regarding how such anisotropic energy cascades can be quantified using multi‐spacecraft constellations. As the heliospheric community increasingly progresses toward multi‐spacecraft, multi‐scale constellations, such as Plasma Observatory and HelioSwarm, we revisit these crucial issues pertinent to accurately measuring the inertial‐range energy transfer. Here, we make a systematic comparison between two methods: direction‐averaging (DA) and lag polyhedral derivative ensemble (LPDE) to determine the full three‐dimensional (3D) dependence of cross‐scale energy transfer. We find that DA exhibits both polar and azimuthal dependence, but is insensitive to spacecraft configuration. By contrast, LPDE is strongly affected by spacecraft separation and tetrahedral shape, while being comparatively insensitive to the sampling trajectory. Our findings have direct implications for current and future multi‐spacecraft missions. Both DA and LPDE will provide crucial information on the nature of turbulence in space and astrophysics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026ja035503
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inertial‐Range Energy Transfer Free From Isotropic Assumption in Turbulent Space Plasma

W. H. Matthaeus, Francesco Pecora, Yan Yang, J. E. Stawarz et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Inertial‐Range Energy Transfer Free From Isotropic Assumption in Turbulent Space Plasma

W. H. Matthaeus, Francesco Pecora, Yan Yang, J. E. Stawarz, K. G. Klein, A. Chasapis, Zhuoran Gao, Bin Jiang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The idea of an energy cascade in the inertial range is often invoked in turbulent space plasmas to estimate the energy dissipation rate. Laws governing the behavior of third‐order structure functions in the inertial range, so‐called third‐order laws, are among the few rigorous theoretical results quantifying cross‐scale energy transfer. The widely used third‐order‐law derived rate assumes isotropy, which fundamentally conflicts with the anisotropic nature of space plasmas. Elementary questions persist regarding how such anisotropic energy cascades can be quantified using multi‐spacecraft constellations. As the heliospheric community increasingly progresses toward multi‐spacecraft, multi‐scale constellations, such as Plasma Observatory and HelioSwarm, we revisit these crucial issues pertinent to accurately measuring the inertial‐range energy transfer. Here, we make a systematic comparison between two methods: direction‐averaging (DA) and lag polyhedral derivative ensemble (LPDE) to determine the full three‐dimensional (3D) dependence of cross‐scale energy transfer. We find that DA exhibits both polar and azimuthal dependence, but is insensitive to spacecraft configuration. By contrast, LPDE is strongly affected by spacecraft separation and tetrahedral shape, while being comparatively insensitive to the sampling trajectory. Our findings have direct implications for current and future multi‐spacecraft missions. Both DA and LPDE will provide crucial information on the nature of turbulence in space and astrophysics.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(8)
University of Arizona (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Northumbria University (GB), Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (US), Xiangtan University (CN), University of Delaware (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.