Facial Recognition Technology in the Global Divide: Why Real-Time Biometric Identification Should Be Banned Beyond the EU AI Act

Abstract This article explores the global divide in regulating facial recognition technology for law enforcement, focusing on tensions between the European Union’s exceptions and the right to non-discrimination. Moving beyond privacy-based critiques, it grounds the analysis in equal treatment guarantees. Using Brazil as a case study, the article argues against reproducing the EU AI Act’s exceptions permitting real-time remote biometric identification by law enforcement. It demonstrates that even technically accurate FRT systems, when deployed within contexts of racialized policing and structural inequality, inevitably generate discriminatory outcomes. By highlighting the role of scale and limited contestability of algorithmic decisions, the article shows how real-time biometric identification produces a qualitatively distinct form of discriminatory harm. It concludes that Brazil, and countries facing similar structural disparities, should adopt an outright ban on real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement, recognising that certain technological practices are inherently incompatible with constitutional guarantees of equality and non-discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Human Rights Journal
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2026.10047
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial Recognition Technology in the Global Divide: Why Real-Time Biometric Identification Should Be Banned Beyond the EU AI Act

Ana Correa
Business and Human Rights Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Facial Recognition Technology in the Global Divide: Why Real-Time Biometric Identification Should Be Banned Beyond the EU AI Act

Ana Correa
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the global divide in regulating facial recognition technology for law enforcement, focusing on tensions between the European Union’s exceptions and the right to non-discrimination. Moving beyond privacy-based critiques, it grounds the analysis in equal treatment guarantees. Using Brazil as a case study, the article argues against reproducing the EU AI Act’s exceptions permitting real-time remote biometric identification by law enforcement. It demonstrates that even technically accurate FRT systems, when deployed within contexts of racialized policing and structural inequality, inevitably generate discriminatory outcomes. By highlighting the role of scale and limited contestability of algorithmic decisions, the article shows how real-time biometric identification produces a qualitatively distinct form of discriminatory harm. It concludes that Brazil, and countries facing similar structural disparities, should adopt an outright ban on real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement, recognising that certain technological practices are inherently incompatible with constitutional guarantees of equality and non-discrimination.

Business and Human Rights Journal
KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.