Creating true and false memories from forgotten information in Drosophila

Recovering forgotten memories is a double-edged sword. While regaining access to forgotten information can be advantageous, targeted memory recovery carries the risk of generating false memories. The neuronal processes governing true memory recovery and false memory formation remain poorly understood. Here we show in Drosophila that reminder cues recover forgotten aversive memories. Forgotten memories persist as silent memory traces in behaviorally neutral mushroom body output neurons. From this silent state, reminders recover memory expression by reinstating the original memory trace in mushroom body output neurons that guide behavior. However, manipulating reminders can distort recovery, leading to false memory formation. The effectiveness of this distortion depends on whether misleading reminder cues were present during the original training event. Both true memory recovery and false memory formation are context-dependent processes gated by separable dopaminergic pathways. Together, these findings suggest that forgotten memories can re-emerge through a reconstructive process that flexibly integrates stored information and recent experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-026-02381-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating true and false memories from forgotten information in Drosophila

Johanna Schweizer, Wenbin Yang, Miguel Pavão-Delgado, Büşra Çoban et al.
1 citations
Nature Neuroscience
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
8.36
article

Creating true and false memories from forgotten information in Drosophila

Johanna Schweizer, Wenbin Yang, Miguel Pavão-Delgado, Büşra Çoban, Benedetta Zattera, Carolin Warnecke, Johannes Felsenberg, Ana Ricciuti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recovering forgotten memories is a double-edged sword. While regaining access to forgotten information can be advantageous, targeted memory recovery carries the risk of generating false memories. The neuronal processes governing true memory recovery and false memory formation remain poorly understood. Here we show in Drosophila that reminder cues recover forgotten aversive memories. Forgotten memories persist as silent memory traces in behaviorally neutral mushroom body output neurons. From this silent state, reminders recover memory expression by reinstating the original memory trace in mushroom body output neurons that guide behavior. However, manipulating reminders can distort recovery, leading to false memory formation. The effectiveness of this distortion depends on whether misleading reminder cues were present during the original training event. Both true memory recovery and false memory formation are context-dependent processes gated by separable dopaminergic pathways. Together, these findings suggest that forgotten memories can re-emerge through a reconstructive process that flexibly integrates stored information and recent experiences.

Nature Neuroscience
University of Basel (CH), Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH), Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
8.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.