Fehlwörter: On the Structural Necessity of Semantic Failure in Buddhist Key Terms

This paper introduces the concept of Fehlwort (pl. Fehlwörter) – a word that struc-turally must miss its referent, where the failure to denote is not a deficiency but theoperative function. Central Buddhist terms such as Buddha, Nirvāṇa, and Maitreyaare analysed as Fehlwörter: each points toward that which cannot be captured inlanguage, and each necessarily fails – yet it is precisely this failure that constitutestheir communicative power. While existing Buddhist and Sanskritic metalinguis-tic concepts – paññatti/prajñapti, saṃvṛti, upāya – approach aspects of the problem,none captures the specific structural claim that the word’s missing its target is itsfunction. A closing section develops a generative model of transmission – seed,unfolding rule, apparatus – drawn from the dynamics of Julia sets, in which theFehlwort appears as the invariant of communication: the one class of words whosecharacteristic mode of failure survives the change of apparatus. The paper arguesthat the concept of Fehlwort fills a genuine terminological gap in Buddhist philoso-phy of language and offers a tool for re-reading the tradition’s persistent suspicionof its own vocabulary.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21699633
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Fehlwörter: On the Structural Necessity of Semantic Failure in Buddhist Key Terms

Jean-Michel Munderich
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
preprint

Fehlwörter: On the Structural Necessity of Semantic Failure in Buddhist Key Terms

Jean-Michel Munderich
preprint en

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of Fehlwort (pl. Fehlwörter) – a word that struc-turally must miss its referent, where the failure to denote is not a deficiency but theoperative function. Central Buddhist terms such as Buddha, Nirvāṇa, and Maitreyaare analysed as Fehlwörter: each points toward that which cannot be captured inlanguage, and each necessarily fails – yet it is precisely this failure that constitutestheir communicative power. While existing Buddhist and Sanskritic metalinguis-tic concepts – paññatti/prajñapti, saṃvṛti, upāya – approach aspects of the problem,none captures the specific structural claim that the word’s missing its target is itsfunction. A closing section develops a generative model of transmission – seed,unfolding rule, apparatus – drawn from the dynamics of Julia sets, in which theFehlwort appears as the invariant of communication: the one class of words whosecharacteristic mode of failure survives the change of apparatus. The paper arguesthat the concept of Fehlwort fills a genuine terminological gap in Buddhist philoso-phy of language and offers a tool for re-reading the tradition’s persistent suspicionof its own vocabulary.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.