Key insights into biosecurity risks, communication preferences and behaviour change drivers among livestock transporters in Australia

The transportation of livestock poses an increased risk of disease transmission, with transportation vehicles acting as vectors for disease. Biosecurity management within the livestock industry is therefore critical to reduce the risk of disease transmission. This study investigated the current biosecurity practices of stakeholders within the livestock transport industry in Australia using a cross-sectional study. It examined how communications technology is utilised in this sector, exploring the drivers and barriers influencing the adoption of communications technology for managing biosecurity risks. The COM-B model of behaviour change informed the development of the cross-sectional study. Data obtained through a questionnaire (n = 17) and semistructured interviews (n = 10) identified a moderate understanding of biosecurity and engagement with best practice biosecurity. The key biosecurity risks identified were in relation to truck washing, effluent management, distances travelled, load mixing and access to relevant biosecurity information. Some practices that contributed to the biosecurity risk were influenced by external factors, such as access to truck washing facilities. Results suggest that while there is general satisfaction with how communication is managed, a mobile application (app) to communicate biosecurity messages could support biosecurity information exchange given the widespread use of text messaging, along with the high level of use of apps for both personal and business purposes. However, for urgent messages a phone call was preferred. The most trusted sources of animal health information included government agencies and the national industry organisations. The COM-B model identified that there was a reasonable perception of physical and psychological capability around biosecurity, and most respondents identified that there was room for improvement with biosecurity uptake which could be used as a motivation for change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Veterinary Journal
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.70126
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key insights into biosecurity risks, communication preferences and behaviour change drivers among livestock transporters in Australia

Lynne Hayes, Jennifer Bond, Marta Hernández‐Jover, Jennifer Manyweathers
Australian Veterinary Journal
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
article

Key insights into biosecurity risks, communication preferences and behaviour change drivers among livestock transporters in Australia

Lynne Hayes, Jennifer Bond, Marta Hernández‐Jover, Jennifer Manyweathers
article en

Abstract

The transportation of livestock poses an increased risk of disease transmission, with transportation vehicles acting as vectors for disease. Biosecurity management within the livestock industry is therefore critical to reduce the risk of disease transmission. This study investigated the current biosecurity practices of stakeholders within the livestock transport industry in Australia using a cross-sectional study. It examined how communications technology is utilised in this sector, exploring the drivers and barriers influencing the adoption of communications technology for managing biosecurity risks. The COM-B model of behaviour change informed the development of the cross-sectional study. Data obtained through a questionnaire (n = 17) and semistructured interviews (n = 10) identified a moderate understanding of biosecurity and engagement with best practice biosecurity. The key biosecurity risks identified were in relation to truck washing, effluent management, distances travelled, load mixing and access to relevant biosecurity information. Some practices that contributed to the biosecurity risk were influenced by external factors, such as access to truck washing facilities. Results suggest that while there is general satisfaction with how communication is managed, a mobile application (app) to communicate biosecurity messages could support biosecurity information exchange given the widespread use of text messaging, along with the high level of use of apps for both personal and business purposes. However, for urgent messages a phone call was preferred. The most trusted sources of animal health information included government agencies and the national industry organisations. The COM-B model identified that there was a reasonable perception of physical and psychological capability around biosecurity, and most respondents identified that there was room for improvement with biosecurity uptake which could be used as a motivation for change.

Australian Veterinary Journal
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian Government
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.