Qualitative Ethics and the AI War Machine

Using the dispute between the U.S. Department of Defense and Anthropic, alongside backlash against OpenAI, I trace the militarized lineages of frontier AI labs and their relevance for qualitative ethics. Public discourse cast these disputes as moral contests between responsible and irresponsible firms, inviting qualitative researchers to express ethics through vendor choice. I argue that this framing functions as machinewashing, personalizing accountability while obscuring the defense, cloud, and procurement infrastructures through which universities, publishers, and researchers are already entangled. Read through necropolitics, the dispute reveals how AI policies construct a protected human subject, the “American,” while leaving others exposed to violence. Current debates over whether and how to use AI do not reach this infrastructural scale. Drawing on the implicated subject, I ask what responsibility requires when inquiry depends on infrastructures shaped by war.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004261468239
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative Ethics and the AI War Machine

Lorien S. Jordan
Qualitative Inquiry
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Qualitative Ethics and the AI War Machine

Lorien S. Jordan
article en

Abstract

Using the dispute between the U.S. Department of Defense and Anthropic, alongside backlash against OpenAI, I trace the militarized lineages of frontier AI labs and their relevance for qualitative ethics. Public discourse cast these disputes as moral contests between responsible and irresponsible firms, inviting qualitative researchers to express ethics through vendor choice. I argue that this framing functions as machinewashing, personalizing accountability while obscuring the defense, cloud, and procurement infrastructures through which universities, publishers, and researchers are already entangled. Read through necropolitics, the dispute reveals how AI policies construct a protected human subject, the “American,” while leaving others exposed to violence. Current debates over whether and how to use AI do not reach this infrastructural scale. Drawing on the implicated subject, I ask what responsibility requires when inquiry depends on infrastructures shaped by war.

Qualitative Inquiry
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.