Patient-Provider Communication and Treatment Decision-Making among Latino Men with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Hispanic/Latino men in the United States, excluding skin cancers. However, little is known about how patient-provider communication influences prostate cancer knowledge and treatment decision-making specifically among Latino prostate cancer patients. Thus, we explored how patient-provider communication influences prostate cancer knowledge and treatment decision-making for Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients in Los Angeles County. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews among 26 men who self-identified as Hispanic/Latino and were recently diagnosed with prostate cancer in Urology clinics at the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Los Angeles General Medical Center between May 2020 and October 2022. RESULTS: Patient-provider relationships and communication significantly shaped treatment decision-making processes for prostate cancer. Positive patient-provider relationships, characterized by provider attentiveness, clear communication, and supplemental resources, facilitated shared decision-making and trust-based deference to physician expertise. Negative patient-provider relationships, characterized by provider inattentiveness, insufficient information, and blunt tone, resulted in authority-based deference. Three distinct decision-making processes were described by patients; shared decision-making, trust-based deference to the doctor's treatment recommendations due to expertise and trust, and authority-based deference to the doctor's "orders" due to the doctor's authority. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the importance of patient-provider relationships to facilitate positive care experiences and shared decision-making processes among Latino prostate cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-026-03125-5
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Provider Communication and Treatment Decision-Making among Latino Men with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Leslie Ballas, André L. T. Abreu, Mariana Stern, Victoria Eli Rodríguez et al.
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Patient-Provider Communication and Treatment Decision-Making among Latino Men with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Leslie Ballas, André L. T. Abreu, Mariana Stern, Victoria Eli Rodríguez, Briseyda Mendoza-Aguayo, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Janet Rodriguez, Jennifer B. Unger, Carla M. Ramirez, Rojine Ariani, Daniel Soto
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Hispanic/Latino men in the United States, excluding skin cancers. However, little is known about how patient-provider communication influences prostate cancer knowledge and treatment decision-making specifically among Latino prostate cancer patients. Thus, we explored how patient-provider communication influences prostate cancer knowledge and treatment decision-making for Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients in Los Angeles County. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews among 26 men who self-identified as Hispanic/Latino and were recently diagnosed with prostate cancer in Urology clinics at the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Los Angeles General Medical Center between May 2020 and October 2022. RESULTS: Patient-provider relationships and communication significantly shaped treatment decision-making processes for prostate cancer. Positive patient-provider relationships, characterized by provider attentiveness, clear communication, and supplemental resources, facilitated shared decision-making and trust-based deference to physician expertise. Negative patient-provider relationships, characterized by provider inattentiveness, insufficient information, and blunt tone, resulted in authority-based deference. Three distinct decision-making processes were described by patients; shared decision-making, trust-based deference to the doctor's treatment recommendations due to expertise and trust, and authority-based deference to the doctor's "orders" due to the doctor's authority. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the importance of patient-provider relationships to facilitate positive care experiences and shared decision-making processes among Latino prostate cancer patients.

Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US), Loyola Marymount University (US), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
University of Southern California, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.