Why “Treat First” Stalls: Knowledge, Scope, and System Determinants of Delayed Haemostatic Therapy in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: Persons with bleeding disorders (PwBD) frequently experience delays to haemostatic therapy in emergency departments (EDs). Identifying clinician knowledge gaps and workflow barriers is essential to accelerate time-to-treatment. OBJECTIVES: To define educational needs and system constraints shaping the evaluation and management of PwBD in Canadian EDs. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods study. An online survey of ED nurses and physicians, distributed via national organizations, used four clinical vignettes to probe triage, diagnostic approach, initial management, and self-rated knowledge; quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Virtual focus groups then explored barriers and solutions and were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred ten clinicians completed the survey (250 nurses; 60 physicians). Most reported prior PwBD experience, but fewer had administered specialized haemostatic products. Across vignettes, respondents assigned high acuity and endorsed a ≤30-min treatment target, yet empiric "treat-first" therapy was inconsistently selected, particularly for non-specific presentations (severe headache, abdominal pain, early pregnancy bleeding). Reported gaps included use of haemostatic therapies; interpretation of coagulation assays; inhibitor management; and limited familiarity with treatment pathways. Barriers included absence of medical directives, treatment release processes, staffing and crowding pressures, and rural resource constraints. Six focus groups (nurses n = 10; physicians n = 4) explained these patterns, revealing a pathway from high perceived acuity to delayed treatment through intersecting knowledge, scope, and system factors, alongside strong preference for concise, point-of-care education, simulation, and web-based learning. CONCLUSIONS: Co-designed education, nurse-initiated directives, streamlined product release, and accessible point-of-care tools are complementary levers to compress triage-to-therapy intervals for PwBD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haemophilia
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70365
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why “Treat First” Stalls: Knowledge, Scope, and System Determinants of Delayed Haemostatic Therapy in the Emergency Department

Roy Khalifé, Lindsay Cowley, Emily Kraft, Hans Rosenberg et al.
Haemophilia
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Why “Treat First” Stalls: Knowledge, Scope, and System Determinants of Delayed Haemostatic Therapy in the Emergency Department

Roy Khalifé, Lindsay Cowley, Emily Kraft, Hans Rosenberg, Susan Humphrey-Murto, Vanessa Bourck, Haowei (Linda) Sun, Calvin Kruger, Kelsey Uminski, Warren J. Cheung
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persons with bleeding disorders (PwBD) frequently experience delays to haemostatic therapy in emergency departments (EDs). Identifying clinician knowledge gaps and workflow barriers is essential to accelerate time-to-treatment. OBJECTIVES: To define educational needs and system constraints shaping the evaluation and management of PwBD in Canadian EDs. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods study. An online survey of ED nurses and physicians, distributed via national organizations, used four clinical vignettes to probe triage, diagnostic approach, initial management, and self-rated knowledge; quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Virtual focus groups then explored barriers and solutions and were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred ten clinicians completed the survey (250 nurses; 60 physicians). Most reported prior PwBD experience, but fewer had administered specialized haemostatic products. Across vignettes, respondents assigned high acuity and endorsed a ≤30-min treatment target, yet empiric "treat-first" therapy was inconsistently selected, particularly for non-specific presentations (severe headache, abdominal pain, early pregnancy bleeding). Reported gaps included use of haemostatic therapies; interpretation of coagulation assays; inhibitor management; and limited familiarity with treatment pathways. Barriers included absence of medical directives, treatment release processes, staffing and crowding pressures, and rural resource constraints. Six focus groups (nurses n = 10; physicians n = 4) explained these patterns, revealing a pathway from high perceived acuity to delayed treatment through intersecting knowledge, scope, and system factors, alongside strong preference for concise, point-of-care education, simulation, and web-based learning. CONCLUSIONS: Co-designed education, nurse-initiated directives, streamlined product release, and accessible point-of-care tools are complementary levers to compress triage-to-therapy intervals for PwBD.

Haemophilia
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.