Artificial Intelligence and the Teaching Workforce: Evidence From National Survey Data in the United States

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shifted rapidly from speculative innovation to active policy concern in U.S. education, yet nationally representative evidence on teachers’ capacity and well-being remains limited. Using U.S. data from TALIS 2024 and design-based linear models, this quantitative study examines how AI-focused professional development (PD), beliefs, perceived barriers, and AI use intensity relate to teachers’ instructional fulfillment and occupational well-being. About 40% of teachers reported AI PD participation and AI use. Positive beliefs predicted higher satisfaction and well-being but also greater stress, whereas critical beliefs predicted lower satisfaction yet higher self-efficacy. Perceived barriers to AI use were associated with lower well-being. Results highlight AI policy as workforce policy, emphasizing high-quality PD, collaboration, and reduced time costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Policy
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048261465649
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and the Teaching Workforce: Evidence From National Survey Data in the United States

Lei Jiang
Educational Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and the Teaching Workforce: Evidence From National Survey Data in the United States

Lei Jiang
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shifted rapidly from speculative innovation to active policy concern in U.S. education, yet nationally representative evidence on teachers’ capacity and well-being remains limited. Using U.S. data from TALIS 2024 and design-based linear models, this quantitative study examines how AI-focused professional development (PD), beliefs, perceived barriers, and AI use intensity relate to teachers’ instructional fulfillment and occupational well-being. About 40% of teachers reported AI PD participation and AI use. Positive beliefs predicted higher satisfaction and well-being but also greater stress, whereas critical beliefs predicted lower satisfaction yet higher self-efficacy. Perceived barriers to AI use were associated with lower well-being. Results highlight AI policy as workforce policy, emphasizing high-quality PD, collaboration, and reduced time costs.

Educational Policy
University of Kansas (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.