DAC8 and the Automatic Exchange of Crypto-Asset Information: Proportionality, Privacy and the Criminal Law Gateway

Council Directive (EU) 2023/2226 (DAC8) extends the automatic exchange of information framework to crypto-asset transactions from 1 January 2026. While principally a tax transparency instrument, DAC8 raises proportionality and data protection concerns and may expose fiscal data to repurposing in criminal proceedings. This note examines DAC8’s architecture and compatibility with articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter, applying the Court of Justice of the European Union’s proportionality framework from La Quadrature du Net (Joined Cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18), Prokuratuur (Case C-746/18) and Privacy International (Case C-623/17). It identifies a “criminal law gateway” through which tax data may migrate into criminal proceedings, engaging the nemo tenetur principle and the Law Enforcement Directive (2016/680). Four recommendations follow.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Taxation
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/cjdcd0
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DAC8 and the Automatic Exchange of Crypto-Asset Information: Proportionality, Privacy and the Criminal Law Gateway

Angelos Tsiftsis
European Taxation
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

DAC8 and the Automatic Exchange of Crypto-Asset Information: Proportionality, Privacy and the Criminal Law Gateway

Angelos Tsiftsis
article en

Abstract

Council Directive (EU) 2023/2226 (DAC8) extends the automatic exchange of information framework to crypto-asset transactions from 1 January 2026. While principally a tax transparency instrument, DAC8 raises proportionality and data protection concerns and may expose fiscal data to repurposing in criminal proceedings. This note examines DAC8’s architecture and compatibility with articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter, applying the Court of Justice of the European Union’s proportionality framework from La Quadrature du Net (Joined Cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18), Prokuratuur (Case C-746/18) and Privacy International (Case C-623/17). It identifies a “criminal law gateway” through which tax data may migrate into criminal proceedings, engaging the nemo tenetur principle and the Law Enforcement Directive (2016/680). Four recommendations follow.

European TaxationVol. 66(8)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.