A Functional–Territorial Typology of Ecosystem Service Provision and Insights for Incentive Design in Portugal

The increasing integration of ecosystem services (ES) into environmental and agricultural policies creates the need for operational approaches linking ecosystem service assessment with territorial planning and incentive design. This study develops a functional–territorial typology of ES provision for mainland Portugal based on the assessment of 26 ecosystem services derived from the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES v5.2) across 278 municipalities. Territorial clusters were identified using provisioning and regulating ES, while cultural ES were subsequently incorporated into functional bundles and territorial–functional analyses. The analysis identified three functional ES bundles and six territorial socio-ecological regimes representing distinct patterns of ES provision. Functional bundle identification proved highly robust, with 92.3% of ES retaining the same bundle assignment across alternative correlation thresholds. A sensitivity analysis including cultural ES confirmed the stability of the main territorial regimes. Between 70% and 86% of municipalities remained within the same territorial group, while most reclassifications occurred near the boundaries between neighbouring regimes, indicating local refinements rather than changes in the overall territorial organization. Cross-analysis showed that territorial regimes differ systematically in ES configurations, baseline conditions, and patterns of synergies and trade-offs, indicating that additionality is inherently territorial and cannot be adequately interpreted using uniform baselines. Building on these findings, we propose a framework of territorially differentiated Ecosystem Service Provision Units (UPSE) incorporating variations in ES configurations and additionality potential across socio-ecological contexts. The framework provides a methodological basis for more context-sensitive ES incentives, restoration strategies, and environmental policy instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081372
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Functional–Territorial Typology of Ecosystem Service Provision and Insights for Incentive Design in Portugal

Nuno Rico, Maria Teresa Cândido da Silva, Filipe X. Catry, Margarida Tomé et al.
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

A Functional–Territorial Typology of Ecosystem Service Provision and Insights for Incentive Design in Portugal

Nuno Rico, Maria Teresa Cândido da Silva, Filipe X. Catry, Margarida Tomé, Ana Quintela, Mina Norouzirad, Carlos Rio Carvalho, Miguel N. Bugalho, Susana Dias, João Torres, Rui Santos, Inês Chaby, João Rocha
article en

Abstract

The increasing integration of ecosystem services (ES) into environmental and agricultural policies creates the need for operational approaches linking ecosystem service assessment with territorial planning and incentive design. This study develops a functional–territorial typology of ES provision for mainland Portugal based on the assessment of 26 ecosystem services derived from the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES v5.2) across 278 municipalities. Territorial clusters were identified using provisioning and regulating ES, while cultural ES were subsequently incorporated into functional bundles and territorial–functional analyses. The analysis identified three functional ES bundles and six territorial socio-ecological regimes representing distinct patterns of ES provision. Functional bundle identification proved highly robust, with 92.3% of ES retaining the same bundle assignment across alternative correlation thresholds. A sensitivity analysis including cultural ES confirmed the stability of the main territorial regimes. Between 70% and 86% of municipalities remained within the same territorial group, while most reclassifications occurred near the boundaries between neighbouring regimes, indicating local refinements rather than changes in the overall territorial organization. Cross-analysis showed that territorial regimes differ systematically in ES configurations, baseline conditions, and patterns of synergies and trade-offs, indicating that additionality is inherently territorial and cannot be adequately interpreted using uniform baselines. Building on these findings, we propose a framework of territorially differentiated Ecosystem Service Provision Units (UPSE) incorporating variations in ES configurations and additionality potential across socio-ecological contexts. The framework provides a methodological basis for more context-sensitive ES incentives, restoration strategies, and environmental policy instruments.

LandVol. 15(8)
University of Lisbon (PT), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Forest Research (GB), The Navigator (Portugal) (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.