Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the EORTC QLQ‐ELD14 in Older Patients With Cancer

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-ELD14 in older patients with cancer. METHODS: One hundred thirteen older patients with cancer were included in the study. The validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 were evaluated via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, correlation analyses with the EORTC QLQ-C30, known-group comparisons, Cronbach's alpha, test-retest and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Known-group comparisons were evaluated in patient groups divided according to cancer stage, Karnofsky performance status and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Factor analysis results demonstrated that the Turkish EORTC QLQ-ELD14, with its seven-factor structure, is a sufficient measurement instrument. Moderate to high correlations were observed between the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 and the QLQ-C30 (r = -0.40 to -0.83; p < 0.05). The clinical validity of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 has been demonstrated by its ability to discriminate between different clinical profiles. Cronbach's α coefficient was determined to be 0.719. The intraclass correlation coefficients of all subscales were above 0.80. Excellent agreement was observed in test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of EORTC QLQ-ELD14 is valid and reliable and is suitable for use by researchers and clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70175
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the EORTC QLQ‐ELD14 in Older Patients With Cancer

Merve Keskinkılıç, Sumeyra Sasmaz, Didem Karadibak, Tuğba Yavuzşen et al.
International Journal of Nursing Practice
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the EORTC QLQ‐ELD14 in Older Patients With Cancer

Merve Keskinkılıç, Sumeyra Sasmaz, Didem Karadibak, Tuğba Yavuzşen, Ezgi Ergin
article en

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-ELD14 in older patients with cancer. METHODS: One hundred thirteen older patients with cancer were included in the study. The validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 were evaluated via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, correlation analyses with the EORTC QLQ-C30, known-group comparisons, Cronbach's alpha, test-retest and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Known-group comparisons were evaluated in patient groups divided according to cancer stage, Karnofsky performance status and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Factor analysis results demonstrated that the Turkish EORTC QLQ-ELD14, with its seven-factor structure, is a sufficient measurement instrument. Moderate to high correlations were observed between the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 and the QLQ-C30 (r = -0.40 to -0.83; p < 0.05). The clinical validity of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 has been demonstrated by its ability to discriminate between different clinical profiles. Cronbach's α coefficient was determined to be 0.719. The intraclass correlation coefficients of all subscales were above 0.80. Excellent agreement was observed in test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of EORTC QLQ-ELD14 is valid and reliable and is suitable for use by researchers and clinicians.

International Journal of Nursing PracticeVol. 32(4)
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.