Response of Ionospheric Parameters at Low‐Latitude and Mid‐Latitude Stations to Geomagnetic Storms of March and April 2025

Abstract This study investigates ionospheric responses to geomagnetic storms of 21–24 March and 15–17 April 2025 using GNSS‐derived total electron content (TEC), magnetometer observations, and thermospheric O/N 2 measurements at low and mid‐latitudes across the Northern Hemisphere of the Europe–Africa sector. The March storm reached a SYM‐H minimum of −72 nT, driven by a CME with a brief southward IMF‐Bz interval followed by a high‐speed stream (HSS). Low‐latitude African stations recorded night‐time TEC enhancements of +85% to +168%, attributed to prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) driving night‐time upward E × B plasma transport, while mid‐latitude European stations exhibited mixed deviations. Elevated daytime O/N 2 ratios indicate reduced molecular recombination in the F region during the daytime, consistent with positive daytime ionospheric responses at low latitudes. The April storm reached a SYM‐H minimum of −150 nT, from a compound CME–HSS interaction sustaining southward IMF‐Bz conditions. During 16–17 April, mid‐latitude European stations experienced TEC reductions of −52% to −69% in the main phase, while low‐latitude stations displayed alternating responses. O/N 2 ratios decreased to 0.6–0.8 across the sector, consistent with enhanced molecular recombination and negative ionospheric responses at mid‐latitudes. Magnetometer observations revealed storm‐time perturbations after sudden commencement, consistent with prompt penetration electric fields, followed by latitudinal disturbances during late main and recovery phases. Magnetic signatures for disturbed ionospheric currents Diono, negative at low latitudes and positive at mid‐latitudes, agree with the polarity predicted by the disturbance dynamo model of Blanc and Richmond (1980, https://doi.org/10.1029/ja085ia04p01669 ). These results demonstrate how storm evolution and solar‐wind forcing shape ionospheric variability within the Europe–Africa sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026ja035402
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response of Ionospheric Parameters at Low‐Latitude and Mid‐Latitude Stations to Geomagnetic Storms of March and April 2025

B. Nava, Christine Amory‐Mazaudier, Oladipo E. Abe, Amoré Nel et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Response of Ionospheric Parameters at Low‐Latitude and Mid‐Latitude Stations to Geomagnetic Storms of March and April 2025

B. Nava, Christine Amory‐Mazaudier, Oladipo E. Abe, Amoré Nel, M. V. da Silva, Anton Kashcheyev, Yinka Ajiboye, Olakunle L. Ojo, Olugbenga Olumodimu, M. N. Giday, R. Canning
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates ionospheric responses to geomagnetic storms of 21–24 March and 15–17 April 2025 using GNSS‐derived total electron content (TEC), magnetometer observations, and thermospheric O/N 2 measurements at low and mid‐latitudes across the Northern Hemisphere of the Europe–Africa sector. The March storm reached a SYM‐H minimum of −72 nT, driven by a CME with a brief southward IMF‐Bz interval followed by a high‐speed stream (HSS). Low‐latitude African stations recorded night‐time TEC enhancements of +85% to +168%, attributed to prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) driving night‐time upward E × B plasma transport, while mid‐latitude European stations exhibited mixed deviations. Elevated daytime O/N 2 ratios indicate reduced molecular recombination in the F region during the daytime, consistent with positive daytime ionospheric responses at low latitudes. The April storm reached a SYM‐H minimum of −150 nT, from a compound CME–HSS interaction sustaining southward IMF‐Bz conditions. During 16–17 April, mid‐latitude European stations experienced TEC reductions of −52% to −69% in the main phase, while low‐latitude stations displayed alternating responses. O/N 2 ratios decreased to 0.6–0.8 across the sector, consistent with enhanced molecular recombination and negative ionospheric responses at mid‐latitudes. Magnetometer observations revealed storm‐time perturbations after sudden commencement, consistent with prompt penetration electric fields, followed by latitudinal disturbances during late main and recovery phases. Magnetic signatures for disturbed ionospheric currents Diono, negative at low latitudes and positive at mid‐latitudes, agree with the polarity predicted by the disturbance dynamo model of Blanc and Richmond (1980, https://doi.org/10.1029/ja085ia04p01669 ). These results demonstrate how storm evolution and solar‐wind forcing shape ionospheric variability within the Europe–Africa sector.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(8)
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT), South African National Space Agency (ZA), Afe Babalola University (NG), Sorbonne Université (FR), Ethiopian Space Science and Technology Institute (ET), Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (FR), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Federal University Oye Ekiti (NG), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), University of Portsmouth (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.